Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 27
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
DABROWSKI v. Poland
DABROWSKI v. Poland POL 19/03/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to conviction of a journalist for defamation in criminal proceedings for having published articles about the deputy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18437
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KERVANCI v. Turkey
KERVANCI v. Turkey TUR 08/12/2020 00:00:00 10/12/2020 21:35:28 Case Description: Freedom of expression and freedom of assembly: Unlawful interference due to the applicants conviction and sentencing for membership of an illegal organisation under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56411
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
LYASHKO v. Ukraine
LYASHKO v. Ukraine UKR 10/11/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for publishing four articles criticising certain state officials. Article 10 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26174
MEDIPRESS-SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA, LDA v. Portugal
MEDIPRESS SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA LDA v. Portugal PRT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:49:23 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of the applicants in civil or criminal proceedings to pay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45765
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia ARM 03/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the declaration the applicant legally incapable in 2013 following proceedings brought by his wife and son. The Court found that the applicant could neither EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54709
PANTEA v. Romania
PANTEA v. Romania ROU 03/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13075
PATUREL v. France
PATUREL v. France FRA 22/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Dispropotionate interference due to criminal or civil convictions or findings in proceedings for defamation for condoning or complicity in condoning war EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33189
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/06/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protection the applicants son s life in detention on remand and lack of effective investigations into his violent death EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2628
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455