Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 43
A.A. v. Belgium
A.A. v. Belgium BEL 26/09/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:18:10 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of a rejected asylum seeker s deportation to Pakistan. Articles 3 procedural limb and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54103
A.A. v. Switzerland
A.A. v. Switzerland CHE 02/05/2020 00:00:00 19/02/2020 17:13:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment of an asylum seeker in the case of his deportation to Afghanistan lack of a rigorous and thorough examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54771
A.C. AND OTHERS v. Spain
A.C. AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 22/07/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: The applicants in this case are thirty persons of Saharawi origin who had their requests for international protection dismissed by the administration in 2011 and 2012 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5782
A.H. v. Cyprus
A.H. v. Cyprus CYP 21/10/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / deportation and protection of life and against ill treatment: Various stages of unlawful detention of Syrian asylumseekers without legal basis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3215
A. v. the Netherlands
A. v. the Netherlands NLD 20/10/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Risk of ill treatment in case of expulsion to Libya Status of Execution: On 10/11/2010 the Minister for Immigration Integration and Asylum Policy rejected the request for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4557
BADER AND KANBOR v. Sweden
BADER AND KANBOR v. Sweden SWE 08/02/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Dismissal of the asylum application of a Syrian husband his wife and their children and adoption of a decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2160
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 10/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to provide sufficient reasons to justify the administrative detention in 2014 for five months and twenty days of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50019
BUISHVILI v. the Czech Republic
BUISHVILI v. the Czech Republic CZE 25/01/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Denial of access to proceedings allowing ordering the release of an asylum seeker: inability of the court reviewing the lawfulness of an asylum seeker s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6434
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/11/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment protection of rights in detention effective remedy: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation to India lack of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2388
CONKA v. Belgium
CONKA v. Belgium BEL 05/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / expulsion / prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens: Arrest of Slovakian nationals and asylum seekers of Roma origin with a view to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1477
DAOUDI v. France
DAOUDI v. France FRA 03/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation of an Algerian national convicted of preparing an act of terrorism and using a froged document to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33075
DIALLO v. the Czech Republic
DIALLO v. the Czech Republic CZE 28/11/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/ deportation: Automatic dismissal of asylum applications and applications for judicial review on the basis that the applicants from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6340
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GEBREMEDHIN [GABERAMADHIEN] v. France
GEBREMEDHIN GABERAMADHIEN v. France FRA 26/07/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective remedy with automatic suspensive effect as requested by the Convention to defend the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33047
H.G.S. v. Belgium
H.G.S. v. Belgium BEL 07/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 14:41:45 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation to Afghanistan of the applicant whose second asylum application had been dismissed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51827
HUMBATOV v. Azerbaijan
HUMBATOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 03/03/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 14:48:21 Case Description: These cases concern the non enforcement of final domestic court decisions violations of Article 6 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 entailing three different kinds of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1898
I.M. v. France
I.M. v. France FRA 02/05/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Absence of effective remedy / Protection against ill treatment / deportation: Limited accessibility of two remedies available in practice to a Sudanese asylum seeker who wished EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28453
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223