Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 127
MORARU v. Romania
MORARU v. Romania ROU 08/02/2023 00:00:00 23/02/2023 15:00:52 Case Description: The case concerns the failure of the domestic courts to give objective and reasonable justification for refusal to allow a woman whose height and weight were below the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62713
MOSTACCIUOLO GIUSEPPE v. Italy (I)
MOSTACCIUOLO GIUSEPPE v. Italy I ITA 29/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Delay in the payments of sums awarded in the framework of a compensatory remedy Pinto to victims of excessively EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28214
N. v. Romania
N. v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe shortage in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49121
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 08/07/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: This group of 25 cases concerns violations of the right to free elections Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of members of opposition parties or independent candidates in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1773
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case of Namazov concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his disbarment in 2011 2012 in the absence of adequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55353
NEVES CARATÃO PINTO v. Portugal
NEVES CARAT O PINTO v. Portugal PRT 13/10/2021 00:00:00 24/01/2022 11:55:19 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of various deficiencies in the framework of application of special protective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59461
NICHIFOR v. Romania (no 1)
NICHIFOR v. Romania no 1 ROU 13/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before administrative institutions responsible for the application of laws related to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16147
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia
PEREVEDENTSEVY v. Russia RUS 13/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure by the domestic authorities to protect the life of the applicants son suicide during his mandatory military service in 2003 2004 and to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13940
PERRY v. the United Kingdom
PERRY v. the United Kingdom GBR 17/10/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the applicant s videotaping without his knowledge by the police for identification purposes in the context EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2722
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia RUS 30/03/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the quashing of final court decisions delivered in the applicants favour on account of newly discovered circumstances these most often being EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13583
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania ROU 12/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58659
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Cases: R.I. and Others v. Romania application no. 57077/16 judgment final on 4 December 2018 Olindraru v. Romania application no. 1490/17 judgment final on 19 March EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50931
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia SVK 01/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations related to excessive use of force by the police failure to protect physical well being of persons in police custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56501
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg LUX 25/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches conducted at the home and the workplace of a journalist and at the chambers of the his lawyer following the publication in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-109