Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
EISENSTECKEN v. Austria
EISENSTECKEN v. Austria AUT 03/10/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Absence of a public hearing in administrative proceedings before the authorities competent for real property transactions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-831
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG, STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria AUT 28/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the insufficiently reasoned refusal by a regional authority EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-493
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria (no. 3)
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria no. 3 AUT 10/04/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Interference without sufficient and relevant reasons due to the awarding of compensation following the allegedly unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-491
W.R. v. Austria
W.R. v. Austria AUT 21/12/1999 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before disciplinary courts and the Constitutional Court. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-803
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979