Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 349
PANETTA v. Italy
PANETTA v. Italy ITA 15/10/2014 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:20:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of national proceedings intended to provide assistance under the New York Convention of 1956 on the recovery of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45028
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia SVK 10/11/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention delay in the ruling on a request for release no decision had been delivered and lack enforceable right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7831
PESA v. Croatia
PESA v. Croatia HRV 08/07/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and presumption of innocence: Unjustified detention and delayed decision on the constitutionality of detention and statements by public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12557
PETKOV AND PROFIROV v. Bulgaria
PETKOV AND PROFIROV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/11/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention for 24 hours without reasonable suspicion to have committed specific thefts and without purpose to be EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4041
PILAGS v. Latvia
PILAGS v. Latvia LVA 03/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: The present case concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial as the domestic courts did not properly examine the applicant s allegations of incitement in the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59813
PINI AND BERTANI v. Romania
PINI AND BERTANI v. Romania ROU 22/09/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce two final court decisions by which two Italian couples had adopted two abandoned children who were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16213
PLECHANOW v. Poland
PLECHANOW v. Poland POL 07/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Failure to comply with positive obligation to provide measures safeguarding the applicants right to the effective enjoyment of their possession: impossibility to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39901
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia ARM 12/09/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Lack of effective remedy under Armenian law to apply for compensation for the non pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant in connection with his ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-459
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
PULATLI v. Turkey
PULATLI v. Turkey TUR 26/07/2011 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Unlawful detention on the basis of a disciplinary decision taken by the applicant s immediate military superior and not by an independent and impartial tribunal Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5648
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Cases: R.I. and Others v. Romania application no. 57077/16 judgment final on 4 December 2018 Olindraru v. Romania application no. 1490/17 judgment final on 19 March EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50931
R.K. AND A.K. v. the United Kingdom
R.K. AND A.K. v. the United Kingdom GBR 30/12/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy to establish a local authority s responsibility for damage suffered and to obtain compensation for taking the applicants daughter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2806
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia SVK 01/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations related to excessive use of force by the police failure to protect physical well being of persons in police custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56501
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan AZE 01/05/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of of the right to freedom of association on account of the authorities a unlawful de facto refusals to register the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1607
RANA v. Hungary
RANA v. Hungary HUN 16/07/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal in 2016 to change the transgender refugee applicant s name and sex marker from female to male due to a gap in the relevant legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55665
RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. Azerbaijan
RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAH S WITNESSES v. Azerbaijan AZE 20/06/2020 00:00:00 29/06/2020 11:35:05 Case Description: The case of Religious Community of Jehovah s Witnesses concerns a violation of the applicant community s freedom of expression on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55457
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom
ROCHE v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life access to information: Absence of an effective and accessible procedure enabling the applicant s access to all relevant and appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2508
RODRIGUES DA SILVA AND HOOGKAMER v. the Netherlands
RODRIGUES DA SILVA AND HOOGKAMER v. the Netherlands NLD 03/07/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to refusal to grant a residence permit to the Brazilian mother of a Dutch child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4517
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia MKD 12/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the Pension and Disability Fund s decision to discontinue payment of the applicant s retirement pension EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55031