Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 281 - 300 of 349
SERGEY SHEVCHENKO v. Ukraine
SERGEY SHEVCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 04/07/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns death during military service. In both cases the Court found a violation of the procedural limb of Article 2 on account of the failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31340
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SHAW v. Hungary
SHAW v. Hungary HUN 26/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10523
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine
SHCHOKIN v. Ukraine UKR 03/01/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the death of the applicant s son in a penitentiary colony in October 2000 his ill treatment before his death by co prisoners and probably by a prison guard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31359
SHCHUKIN AND OTHERS v. Cyprus
SHCHUKIN AND OTHERS v. Cyprus CYP 29/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Ineffective investigations into alleged ill treatment by the police: allegations of excessive use of force when Ukrainian crew members of a Ukrainian ship EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2024
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
SIERPINSKI v. Poland
SIERPINSKI v. Poland POL 03/02/2010 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal to pay compensation for a property unlawfully expropriated in 1967 based the domestic courts view that the applicant s claims for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39919
SKALKA v. Poland
SKALKA v. Poland POL 27/08/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction and further term of imprisonment of a detainee for insulting a State authority having written a letter to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17929
SMILJANIC v. Croatia
SMILJANIC v. Croatia HRV 25/06/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: This case concerns the domestic authorities failure to effectively implement road traffic regulations and take appropriate deterrent and preventive measures against a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58071
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/05/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deaths life threatening injuries or ill treatment during arrest and other law enforcement operations. The facts occurred between 2000 and 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12812
SOCIETE BOUYGUES CONSTRUCTION AND OTHERS v. France
SOCIETE BOUYGUES CONSTRUCTION AND OTHERS v. France FRA 18/06/2015 00:00:00 17/11/2016 09:12:19 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39269
SOCIETE CANAL PLUS AND OTHERS v. France
SOCIETE CANAL PLUS AND OTHERS v. France FRA 21/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court to challenge the lawfulness of searches and seizures to which the applicants had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33083
SOLSKA AND RYBICKA v. Poland
SOLSKA AND RYBICKA v. Poland POL 20/12/2018 00:00:00 16/01/2019 17:03:19 Case Description: Lack of sufficient safeguards against arbitrariness with regard to a prosecutorial decision of 2018 ordering the exhumation of the applicants relatives to which the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51179
SPLIT FERRY PORT JSC v. Croatia
SPLIT FERRY PORT JSC v. Croatia HRV 28/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicant s right to a of a fair hearing due to the Constitutional Court s failure between 2011 2016 to serve a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60171
SPORER v. Austria
SPORER v. Austria AUT 03/05/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock: difference in treatment as regards the judicial scrutiny in the attribution of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1081
STAFFORD v. the United Kingdom
STAFFORD v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Continued detention of prisoners sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment after the expiry of their tariffs without review of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2618
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia SRB 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the ineffective investigations into the allegations of ill treatment by police officers procedural violations of Article 3 ill treatment by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7310
STANKA MIRKOVIC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro
STANKA MIRKOVIC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro MNE 07/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings concerning the expropriation of land from the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47283
STEININGER v. Austria
STEININGER v. Austria AUT 17/07/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:17:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the limited power of review of the Administrative Court as regards the applicant companies EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-537
STOICESCU (I) v. Romania
STOICESCU I v. Romania ROU 26/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to comply with the obligation to protect the applicant s physical and psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17498