Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 41
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey TUR 01/03/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Right to liberty and security / deportation and extradition protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: absence of clear legal provisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37254
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BATTISTA v. Italy
BATTISTA v. Italy ITA 02/03/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 15:32:11 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts automatic refusal to issue the applicant with a passport and the decision to invalidate his identity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33557
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 05/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: Protection of property: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to the automatic order to return payments the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50539
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
DALBAN v. Romania
DALBAN v. Romania ROU 28/09/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Criminal convictions of journalists for insult and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15961
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
HIRST v. the United Kingdom (no. 2)
HIRST v. the United Kingdom no. 2 GBR 06/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Electoral rights: General automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners on voting in parliamentary elections. Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2204
HORYCH v. Poland
HORYCH v. Poland POL 17/07/2012 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and private and family life: The dangerous detainee regime pursuant to Article 212a of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences placement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39925
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
KARWOWSKI v. Poland
KARWOWSKI v. Poland POL 19/07/2016 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: The dangerous detainee regime pursuant to Article 88 3 88a and 88b and 212 a of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences placement on a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39941
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
M.A. v. Cyprus
M.A. v. Cyprus CYP 23/10/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: This case concerns the detention of an asylum seeker between June 2010 and May 2011. The European Court found that the applicant s detention had been unlawful because it had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3213
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 14/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the Convention on account of refusals of border guards to receive asylum application from the applicants on various occasions between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56535