Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 26
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ANAGNOSTOU-DEDOULI v. Greece
ANAGNOSTOU DEDOULI v. Greece GRC 16/12/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:42:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non compliance or delayed compliance with domestic court judgments ordering the lifting of land expropriation orders EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15139
ARMANDO IANNELLI v. Italy
ARMANDO IANNELLI v. Italy ITA 12/05/2013 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Insufficient amount of compensation awarded in the context of a compensatory remedy available since 2001 to victims of excessively lengthy proceedings Repetitive cases EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44653
CEGOLEA v. Romania
CEGOLEA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: In Romania the Constitution reserves one seat in the Chamber of Deputies to each national minority whose organisations do not attain the electoral threshold. This case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55723
DE TOMMASO v. Italy
DE TOMMASO v. Italy ITA 23/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: This case concerns the quality of the Italian legislation on imposition of special police supervision orders involving restrictions of various freedoms on persons considered EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46307
DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 10/11/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property of home and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to the denial of access to the applicants property in South East Turkey on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5572
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
HUMBATOV v. Azerbaijan
HUMBATOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 03/03/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 14:48:21 Case Description: These cases concern the non enforcement of final domestic court decisions violations of Article 6 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 entailing three different kinds of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1898
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 16/08/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the domestic courts to examine the proportionality of the interference with the applicants property rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32248
MAMCHUR v. Ukraine
MAMCHUR v. Ukraine UKR 16/10/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns the failure of the domestic authorities and domestic courts at different times between 2005 and 2012 to give relevant and sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31251
MIRZAYEV v. Azerbaijan
MIRZAYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 03/03/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern the non enforcement of final domestic court decisions violations of Article 6 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 entailing three different kinds of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1719
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia ARM 17/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an aggressive homophobic campaign against the applicant a well known member of the lesbian gay bisexual and transgender LGBT community in Armenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60993
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744