Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 67
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
AMER v. Turkey
AMER v. Turkey TUR 06/07/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings from 29 May 2001 2 March 2006 four years and 9 months for two levels of jurisdiction violation of Article 6 1 and infringement of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37140
ANDREJEVA v. Latvia
ANDREJEVA v. Latvia LVA 18/02/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Discrimination in conjunction with the right to property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of authorities to take the applicant s years of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12614
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
B.B. AND F.B. v. Germany
B.B. AND F.B. v. Germany DEU 14/06/2013 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Withdrawal of parental custody: Domestic court s failure to establish the relevant facts and to provide sufficient reasons for the decision. Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38512
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270
BELOZOROV v. Russia
BELOZOROV v. Russia RUS 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55229
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14094
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey TUR 01/01/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the demolition of the applicant company s construction work on an expropriated site EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37158
BIZIUK v. Poland (no. 2)
BIZIUK v. Poland no. 2 POL 17/04/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention due to lack of evidence that the applicant s mental condition necessitated his confinement in psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18985
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania ROU 01/10/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: After having obtained the annulment of the forced sale of their property in a fist action rejection of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17411
BUTT v. Norway
BUTT v. Norway NOR 04/03/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Interference with family and private life in case of deportation to Pakistan Status of Execution: Immigration Appeals Board granted permanent residence in 2012. One of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-213
C. C. v. Spain
C. C. v. Spain ESP 06/01/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with private life: Disclosure of the applicant s identity and health state in a judgment delivered in civil proceedings between him and his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3531
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CHAYKOVSKIY v. Ukraine
CHAYKOVSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 01/03/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Denial of the right of individual petition to the Court due the retention by prison authorities of an enclosure to a letter sent by the Court to the applicant for two EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26448
CIMPERSEK v. Slovenia
CIMPERSEK v. Slovenia SVN 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Freedom of expression and functioning of justice: Unnecessary and disproportionate interference on account of the rejection by the Minister of Justice of the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56085
DHAHBI v. Italy
DHAHBI v. Italy ITA 08/07/2014 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:32:00 Case Description: Difference of treatment for obtaining the family allowance due to nationality: difference of treatment based on nationality justified by insufficient budgetary rationales EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45046