Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 27
ASAN v. Turkey
ASAN v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of lack of reasoning and assessment of proportionality of an interference in judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37142
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BRISC v. Romania
BRISC v. Romania ROU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 15:10:37 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s reprimand and consequent removal from the office of chief prosecutor in 2009 as a result of a disciplinary action instituted him on charges EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51829
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
CETINKAYA v. Turkey
CETINKAYA v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s director of a human rights association right to freedom of association on account of his conviction under former Article 37 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37419
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
NAVALNYY AND GUNKO v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND GUNKO v. Russia RUS 10/02/2021 00:00:00 03/03/2021 17:11:43 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56743
NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV v. Russia RUS 04/07/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy and Mr Petr Ofitserov of organising and facilitating large scale EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13537
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2022 00:00:00 06/10/2022 13:27:56 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61369
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. Russia RUS 20/04/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:01:00 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-24942
NAVALNYY v. Russia
NAVALNYY v. Russia RUS 15/05/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 16:43:37 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49511
NAVALNYY v. Russia
NAVALNYY v. Russia RUS 15/11/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50807
NAVALNYY v. Russia (no. 2)
NAVALNYY v. Russia no. 2 RUS 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52759
NAVALNYYE v. Russia
NAVALNYYE v. Russia RUS 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49187
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/11/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59085
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244