Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 541
KLEYN AND ALEKSANDROVICH v. Russia
KLEYN AND ALEKSANDROVICH v. Russia RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:09:02 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to life on account of a failure to effectively investigate the death of the applicants wife and mother a woman of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26114
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOM, SPOLOCNOST S RUCENÍM OBMEDZENÝM v. Slovakia
KOM SPOLOCNOST S RUCEN M OBMEDZEN M v. Slovakia SVK 02/09/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: The present case concerns a disproportionate restriction on the applicant company s right of access to a court as a result of the refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58335
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia RUS 22/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the discrimination of the applicants military serviceman and police officers on account of different conditions for parental leave based on their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13956
KOPRIVNIKAR v. Slovenia
KOPRIVNIKAR v. Slovenia SVN 24/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: No punishment without law: Failure of domestic courts to ensure observance of the principle of legality as the overall penalty imposed on the applicant was in violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47233
KORETSKYY AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KORETSKYY AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 03/07/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and association: Unjustified interference due to the refusal to register a non governmental association for environmental protection based on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33461
KOROSEC v. Slovenia
KOROSEC v. Slovenia SVN 08/01/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: unfair social court proceedings concerning disability allowance as the courts had based their decisions on the opinions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7254
KORTESIS v. Greece
KORTESIS v. Greece GRC 12/09/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:42:24 Case Description: Unlawful detention: beyond the time limit set out by the law for bringing the arrested person before the investigating judge and failure to inform him promptly of the reasons EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22944
KOTLYAR v. Russia
KOTLYAR v. Russia RUS 12/10/2022 00:00:00 28/10/2022 18:21:13 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right not to be punished without law resulting from her conviction based on retroactive application of criminal law for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61732
KOWALSKI v. Poland
KOWALSKI v. Poland POL 11/06/2013 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings: Refusal by the court of appeal in 2008 to appoint a legal aid lawyer with a view to assist in the preparation of the cassation appeal based on an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39893
KRUMPHOLZ v. Austria
KRUMPHOLZ v. Austria AUT 18/06/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Interference with the right to remain silent and the presumption of innocence due to the Independent Administrative Panel s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1149
KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 17/11/2014 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:34:26 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22940
KRYVITSKA AND KRYVITSKYY v. Ukraine
KRYVITSKA AND KRYVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 02/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to respect for home as the applicants having been tenants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31573
KUBLER v. Germany
KUBLER v. Germany DEU 13/04/2011 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Denial of access to a court: Baden W rttemberg Ministry of Justice s failed to comply with an interim injunction issued by the Federal Constitutional Court ordering the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38258
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine UKR 06/12/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns a number of substantial and procedural violations of the applicant s rights under Article 3 while detained on remand at the Kharkiv Regional Pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31583
KULINSKI AND SABEV v. Bulgaria
KULINSKI AND SABEV v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: These cases concern the impossibility for the applicants to vote in parliamentary elections or in elections to the European Parliament between 2009 and 2019 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39505
KUROCHENKO AND ZOLOTUKHIN v. Ukraine
KUROCHENKO AND ZOLOTUKHIN v. Ukraine UKR 11/02/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: The case concerns the failure of the authorities to take all steps available to them to advance the examination of criminal proceedings pending against the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56939
KUTLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey
KUTLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to property on account of the authorities refusal in the period 2006 2012 to expropriate the applicants two plots of land. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47151
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213