Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
A.S. v. Poland
A.S. v. Poland POL 23/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand under a bill of indictment and its prolongation on the basis of a fax from the Supreme Court lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17841
CRABTREE v. the Czech Republic
CRABTREE v. the Czech Republic CZE 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand without legal basis and lack of enforceable right to compensation for unlawful detention. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6186
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
HARKMANN v. Estonia
HARKMANN v. Estonia EST 11/10/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Denial of the applicants right to be brought promptly before a judge following arrest and lack of an enforceable right to compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3073
HIRST v. the United Kingdom
HIRST v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/10/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive interval between the reviews concerning the applicants continued detention as discretionary life prisoners and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2600
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland CHE 11/06/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Restriction of the applicant s access to court on account of the ten year limitation period for asbestos related EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5878
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
KANDZHOV v. Bulgaria
KANDZHOV v. Bulgaria BGR 06/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and freedom of expression: Unlawful arrest and detention lacking promptness of appearance before a judge lack of judicial control of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3813
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
NOLAN AND K. v. Russia
NOLAN AND K. v. Russia RUS 06/07/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns numerous violations of the Convention linked to the first applicant s expulsion in 2002 from the Russian Federation: The first applicant a U.S. citizen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13785
PECK v. the United Kingdom
PECK v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and lack of effective remedy: Disclosure in the media by a local council of an individual s photographs taken by a CCTV camera installed in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2236
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine UKR 30/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:26:32 Case Description: The Shvydka case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to her conviction and sentence to ten days detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37062
SVETOSLAV HRISTOV v. Bulgaria
SVETOSLAV HRISTOV v. Bulgaria BGR 13/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Breach of the principle of legal certainty as domestic law did not prohibit explicitly two consecutive periods of prosecutor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14231