Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 381 - 400 of 723
LADENT v. Poland
LADENT v. Poland POL 18/06/2008 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention disproportionate to the aim of securing the proper conduct of criminal proceedings delays in release from detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39865
LAKICEVIC v. Montenegro and Serbia
LAKICEVIC v. Montenegro and Serbia MNE 13/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Protection of property: Suspension of pension rights due part time work in legal practices Status of Execution: The payment of pensions in respect of all EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11160
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary HUN 13/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants life sentences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10897
LAVENTS v. Latvia
LAVENTS v. Latvia LVA 28/02/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life and correspondence: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31170
LEAS v. Estonia
LEAS v. Estonia EST 06/06/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lacking access to a covert surveillance file leading to the charges and conviction. Failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3105
LELAS v. Croatia
LELAS v. Croatia HRV 20/08/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Unlawful interference with right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Dismissal of the applicants claims for daily allowances for work in demining operations as time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12463
LEUSKA AND OTHERS v. Estonia
LEUSKA AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 07/02/2018 00:00:00 21/02/2018 12:20:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to adjudicate the victims claim for reimbursement of their legal costs in criminal proceedings which were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48949
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LIA v. Malta
LIA v. Malta MLT 05/08/2022 00:00:00 19/08/2022 09:42:37 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal in 2015 of the applicants request for a self funded in vitro fertilisation procedure on the basis of the wife s age based on a law of insufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60983
LIGA PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL PROFISSIONAL v. Portugal
LIGA PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL PROFISSIONAL v. Portugal PRT 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings initially brought against the applicant association before the Lisbon Industrial Tribunal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39525
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
LITSCHAUER v. the Republic of Moldova
LITSCHAUER v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention pending trial on suspicion of having committed the offence of pimping on account of running an erotic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51539
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LIZANETS v. Ukraine
LIZANETS v. Ukraine UKR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing of final domestic judgments in civil matters in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31361
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary HUN 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning the asylum seeking applicants detention violations of Article 5 1 . In Lokpo and Tour Al Tayyar Abdelhakim and Said in 2009 and 2010 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10637
LONCKE v. Belgium
LONCKE v. Belgium BEL 25/12/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Lack of effective access to a court in tax proceedings equivalent to the determination of a criminal charge as the deposit requested to secure costs was disproportionate to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1501
LORENZ v. Austria
LORENZ v. Austria AUT 20/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful preventive detention in an institution for mentally ill offenders lacking factual basis expert opinion and failure to examine the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48115
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands NLD 04/05/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Conditions of detention: Detention regime in a maximum security prison EBI including very stringent security measures the combination of which with routine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4525
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland CHE 09/02/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of private life and discrimination: Discrimination with regard to a binational couple s choice of surname. Article 14 in conjunction with 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4744