Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BYRZYKOWSKI v. Poland
BYRZYKOWSKI v. Poland POL 27/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of the right to life: Deficiencies of investigations into the causes of death of the applicant s wife while giving birth in a hospital. Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18829
HAASE v. Germany
HAASE v. Germany DEU 08/07/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to a court decision to temporarily withdraw parental rights in respect of seven children without sufficient and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38414
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic CZE 11/03/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:24:08 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to a court ordered interim measure requiring the return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47
MITZINGER v. Germany
MITZINGER v. Germany DEU 09/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns discriminatory interference with the applicant s right to respect for her family life in that born out of wedlock in 1940 in the former German Democratic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47113
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PAPAGEORGIOU AND OTHERS v. Greece
PAPAGEORGIOU AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 31/01/2020 00:00:00 19/02/2020 17:13:47 Case Description: This case concerns the state s failure to ensure that education and teaching is in conformity with the parents own religious and philosophical convictions due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54773
PAULIK v. Slovakia
PAULIK v. Slovakia SVK 10/01/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of family life and discrimination: Impossibility to challenge one s paternity if it was established by a court decision discrimination compared with fathers whose EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8393
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RANA v. Hungary
RANA v. Hungary HUN 16/07/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal in 2016 to change the transgender refugee applicant s name and sex marker from female to male due to a gap in the relevant legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55665
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia SRB 09/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life on account of the respondent State s continuing failure to provide her with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7011