Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 36 of 36
P., C. AND S. v. the United Kingdom
P. C. AND S. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/10/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Interference due to the removal of the applicants child shortly after birth EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2670
PAPAGEORGIOU AND OTHERS v. Greece
PAPAGEORGIOU AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 31/01/2020 00:00:00 19/02/2020 17:13:47 Case Description: This case concerns the state s failure to ensure that education and teaching is in conformity with the parents own religious and philosophical convictions due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54773
PAULIK v. Slovakia
PAULIK v. Slovakia SVK 10/01/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of family life and discrimination: Impossibility to challenge one s paternity if it was established by a court decision discrimination compared with fathers whose EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8393
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RANA v. Hungary
RANA v. Hungary HUN 16/07/2020 00:00:00 23/07/2020 11:27:33 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal in 2016 to change the transgender refugee applicant s name and sex marker from female to male due to a gap in the relevant legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55665
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459
SEN v. the Netherlands
SEN v. the Netherlands NLD 21/03/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to grant a residence permit to a daughter who had remained in her birth country to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4473
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
STAVROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece
STAVROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 25/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Unnecessary and unlawful interference with the right not to manifest one s belief due to the registry office s referring in the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56105
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack of regulation of home birth resulted in a situation incompatible with the notion of foreseeability and lawfulness. Therefore the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11570
TOPCIC-ROSENBERG v. Croatia
TOPCIC ROSENBERG v. Croatia HRV 24/03/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal of the Croatian Health Insurance Fund and the Administrative Court in 2006 2009 to grant an adoptive self employed mother maternity leave EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12381
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
YAKUSHEV v. Ukraine
YAKUSHEV v. Ukraine UKR 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the arbitrary dismissal by the domestic courts of the applicants claims regarding their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50899
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia SRB 09/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life on account of the respondent State s continuing failure to provide her with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7011