Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
A.T. v. Estonia
A.T. v. Estonia EST 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Interference due to dismissal without examination of the detained applicant s complaints concerning the circumstances of his visit to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51535
BRAUER v. Germany
BRAUER v. Germany DEU 28/08/2009 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Discriminatory interference with the right to family life in that the applicant born out of wedlock was unable to assert her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38440
CALIN v. Romania
CALIN v. Romania ROU 19/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to inability of the applicants who were born out of wedlock to bring paternity actions on the grounds that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39529
CASARIN v. Italy
CASARIN v. Italy ITA 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The applicant an Italian national who was born in 1950 worked as a teacher in the National Education Ministry from 1973 to 1998 when she formulated a request for mobility and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58067
DOKTOROV v. Bulgaria
DOKTOROV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the inability for the applicant despite relevant DNA test results to contest the paternity of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50267
ELSHOLZ v. Germany
ELSHOLZ v. Germany DEU 13/07/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic court s refusal to grant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38316
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic CZE 11/03/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:24:08 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to a court ordered interim measure requiring the return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47
HOFFMANN v. Germany
HOFFMANN v. Germany DEU 11/01/2002 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified interference due to the applicant s inability to get access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38328
K.K. AND OTHERS v. Denmark
K.K. AND OTHERS v. Denmark DNK 06/03/2023 00:00:00 20/03/2023 09:18:50 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate interference in the right to private life of two children born in Ukraine in December 2013 through a commercial surrogacy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62889
L. v. the Netherlands
L. v. the Netherlands NLD 01/09/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to denial of a father s access to his child born out of wedlock and not formally acknowledged despite existing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4503
MENNESSON v. France
MENNESSON v. France FRA 26/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to refusal to grant legal recognition in France to parent child relationships that had been legally EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28484
MITZINGER v. Germany
MITZINGER v. Germany DEU 09/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns discriminatory interference with the applicant s right to respect for her family life in that born out of wedlock in 1940 in the former German Democratic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47113
NUNEZ v. Norway
NUNEZ v. Norway NOR 28/09/2011 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of family life expulsion : Interference in the event of a mother s expulsion entailing the separation from her children born and living in Norway. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-217
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447