Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 23
A.T. v. Estonia
A.T. v. Estonia EST 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Interference due to dismissal without examination of the detained applicant s complaints concerning the circumstances of his visit to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51535
BARBOTIN v. France
BARBOTIN v. France FRA 19/02/2021 00:00:00 03/03/2021 17:11:43 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention / remedy: Ineffective compensation remedy in view of the low award made in respect of inhuman conditions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56757
CALIN v. Romania
CALIN v. Romania ROU 19/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to inability of the applicants who were born out of wedlock to bring paternity actions on the grounds that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39529
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands NLD 03/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Impossibility to establish retroactively the applicant s relationship with his late father who died before he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4469
DOKTOROV v. Bulgaria
DOKTOROV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the inability for the applicant despite relevant DNA test results to contest the paternity of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50267
ELSHOLZ v. Germany
ELSHOLZ v. Germany DEU 13/07/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic court s refusal to grant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38316
GORGULU v. Germany
GORGULU v. Germany DEU 26/05/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Refusal to give custody to the father of a child born out of wedlock and living with a foster family without considering the long term effects on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38410
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic CZE 11/03/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:24:08 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to a court ordered interim measure requiring the return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47
HOFFMANN v. Germany
HOFFMANN v. Germany DEU 11/01/2002 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified interference due to the applicant s inability to get access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38328
L.D. AND P.K. v. Bulgaria
L.D. AND P.K. v. Bulgaria BGR 08/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Breach on account of the statutory inability for putative biological fathers of children born outside of marriage to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46329
LEITNER v. Austria
LEITNER v. Austria AUT 08/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to private and family life: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47123
LOIRY v. Romania
LOIRY v. Romania ROU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a final court decision of 9 August 2018 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60331
MENNESSON v. France
MENNESSON v. France FRA 26/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to refusal to grant legal recognition in France to parent child relationships that had been legally EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28484
MONORY v. Romania
MONORY v. Romania ROU 05/07/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just satisfaction for non pecuniary damage paid. The child born in 1995 is living in Romania. Her mother was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50255
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
SAHIN v. Germany
SAHIN v. Germany DEU 08/07/2003 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life and discriminatory treatment due to the dismissal of requests for access of parents to their children born out of wedlock and in one case denial of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38320
SCRIPNIC v. the Republic of Moldova
SCRIPNIC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate response from the domestic authorities to the medical negligence leading to the death of a new born baby in 2003 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58193
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546