Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
A.M.M. v. Romania
A.M.M. v. Romania ROU 14/05/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure by the domestic courts to strike a fair balance between a child s right to have his interests safeguarded in paternity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17141
A.T. v. Estonia
A.T. v. Estonia EST 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Interference due to dismissal without examination of the detained applicant s complaints concerning the circumstances of his visit to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51535
BRAUER v. Germany
BRAUER v. Germany DEU 28/08/2009 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Discriminatory interference with the right to family life in that the applicant born out of wedlock was unable to assert her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38440
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey TUR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Inability of a father to exercise his contact rights in relation to his son during the course of excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37108
ELSHOLZ v. Germany
ELSHOLZ v. Germany DEU 13/07/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic court s refusal to grant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38316
GORGULU v. Germany
GORGULU v. Germany DEU 26/05/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Refusal to give custody to the father of a child born out of wedlock and living with a foster family without considering the long term effects on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38410
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic CZE 11/03/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:24:08 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to a court ordered interim measure requiring the return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47
HOFFMANN v. Germany
HOFFMANN v. Germany DEU 11/01/2002 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified interference due to the applicant s inability to get access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38328
LEITNER v. Austria
LEITNER v. Austria AUT 08/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to private and family life: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47123
NUNEZ v. Norway
NUNEZ v. Norway NOR 28/09/2011 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of family life expulsion : Interference in the event of a mother s expulsion entailing the separation from her children born and living in Norway. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-217
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Cases: R.I. and Others v. Romania application no. 57077/16 judgment final on 4 December 2018 Olindraru v. Romania application no. 1490/17 judgment final on 19 March EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50931
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
REIGADO RAMOS v. Portugal
REIGADO RAMOS v. Portugal PRT 22/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to take adequate and sufficient action to enforce the applicant s right of access to his daughter born in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9579
SCRIPNIC v. the Republic of Moldova
SCRIPNIC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate response from the domestic authorities to the medical negligence leading to the death of a new born baby in 2003 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58193
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509