Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 64
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974
H.F. AND OTHERS v. France
H.F. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 14/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the right to enter the State of which a person is a national due to the absence of appropriate safeguards against arbitrariness in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61129
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic
HANZELKOVI v. the Czech Republic CZE 11/03/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:24:08 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to a court ordered interim measure requiring the return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47
HOFFMANN v. Germany
HOFFMANN v. Germany DEU 11/01/2002 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified interference due to the applicant s inability to get access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38328
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
K.K. AND OTHERS v. Denmark
K.K. AND OTHERS v. Denmark DNK 06/03/2023 00:00:00 20/03/2023 09:18:50 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate interference in the right to private life of two children born in Ukraine in December 2013 through a commercial surrogacy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62889
KALACHEVA v. Russia
KALACHEVA v. Russia RUS 07/08/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life in the proceedings aimed at establishing paternity of her daughter born out of wedlock on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13889
KOSTOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
KOSTOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 14/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: The case concerns a disproportionate and excessive burden born by the applicants as a result of application of a method for calculation under the Regulation on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55795
L.D. AND P.K. v. Bulgaria
L.D. AND P.K. v. Bulgaria BGR 08/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Breach on account of the statutory inability for putative biological fathers of children born outside of marriage to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46329
L. v. the Netherlands
L. v. the Netherlands NLD 01/09/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to denial of a father s access to his child born out of wedlock and not formally acknowledged despite existing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4503
LEITNER v. Austria
LEITNER v. Austria AUT 08/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to private and family life: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47123
LOIRY v. Romania
LOIRY v. Romania ROU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a final court decision of 9 August 2018 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60331
MAMCHUR v. Ukraine
MAMCHUR v. Ukraine UKR 16/10/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns the failure of the domestic authorities and domestic courts at different times between 2005 and 2012 to give relevant and sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31251
MENNESSON v. France
MENNESSON v. France FRA 26/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to refusal to grant legal recognition in France to parent child relationships that had been legally EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28484
MICHNEA v. Romania
MICHNEA v. Romania ROU 07/10/2020 00:00:00 03/11/2020 18:11:46 Case Description: The case concerns the infringement of the applicant s right to respect for his family life as a result of the dismissal by a domestic court in 2018 of his request under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56179
MIMBENGA v. Belgium
MIMBENGA v. Belgium BEL 30/01/2020 00:00:00 03/03/2020 14:06:35 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and lack of a remedy: Allegation of excessive delay in deciding the applicants request of a visa for family reunification. Articles 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54835
MITZINGER v. Germany
MITZINGER v. Germany DEU 09/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns discriminatory interference with the applicant s right to respect for her family life in that born out of wedlock in 1940 in the former German Democratic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47113
MIZZI v. Malta
MIZZI v. Malta MLT 12/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of family life and discrimination: Denial of the possibility of a judicial determination of the claim of not being the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4077
MONORY v. Hungary
MONORY v. Hungary HUN 05/07/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings for divorce and child custody. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10493
MONORY v. Romania
MONORY v. Romania ROU 05/07/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just satisfaction for non pecuniary damage paid. The child born in 1995 is living in Romania. Her mother was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50255