Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 64
NEVES CARATÃO PINTO v. Portugal
NEVES CARAT O PINTO v. Portugal PRT 13/10/2021 00:00:00 24/01/2022 11:55:19 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of various deficiencies in the framework of application of special protective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59461
NUNEZ v. Norway
NUNEZ v. Norway NOR 28/09/2011 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of family life expulsion : Interference in the event of a mother s expulsion entailing the separation from her children born and living in Norway. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-217
POPADIC v. Serbia
POPADIC v. Serbia SRB 20/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the excessively lengthy matrimonial proceedings which lasted four years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62246
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Cases: R.I. and Others v. Romania application no. 57077/16 judgment final on 4 December 2018 Olindraru v. Romania application no. 1490/17 judgment final on 19 March EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50931
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
REIGADO RAMOS v. Portugal
REIGADO RAMOS v. Portugal PRT 22/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to take adequate and sufficient action to enforce the applicant s right of access to his daughter born in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9579
REKLOS AND DAVOURLIS v. Greece
REKLOS AND DAVOURLIS v. Greece GRC 15/04/2009 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Dismissal by national courts of the applicants action for damages by which they EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22434
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459
SAHIN v. Germany
SAHIN v. Germany DEU 08/07/2003 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life and discriminatory treatment due to the dismissal of requests for access of parents to their children born out of wedlock and in one case denial of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38320
SCRIPNIC v. the Republic of Moldova
SCRIPNIC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate response from the domestic authorities to the medical negligence leading to the death of a new born baby in 2003 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58193
SEVERE v. Austria
SEVERE v. Austria AUT 21/12/2017 00:00:00 09/02/2018 11:08:46 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48763
SHAW v. Hungary
SHAW v. Hungary HUN 26/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10523
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
SPORER v. Austria
SPORER v. Austria AUT 03/05/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock: difference in treatment as regards the judicial scrutiny in the attribution of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1081
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 23/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicants right to family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a domestic judgment ordering that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59929
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
VERES v. Spain
VERES v. Spain ESP 08/02/2023 00:00:00 23/02/2023 15:00:52 Case Description: The case concerns a legal dispute between the applicant a Hungarian national and his ex wife over the custody of their daughter who was born in 2006. In 2015 the applicant s ex EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62709
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447