Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 301
DIACENCO v. Romania
DIACENCO v. Romania ROU 07/05/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Breach of the presumption of innocence: Despite upholding the applicant s acquittal the Court of Appeal acting as court of last instance nevertheless held him held him EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17530
DIDU v. Romania
DIDU v. Romania ROU 14/09/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the fact that while it closed the criminal case against the applicant for expiry of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16375
DIMITAR KRASTEV v. Bulgaria
DIMITAR KRASTEV v. Bulgaria BGR 12/05/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Lack of proper judicial review of a prosecutor s decision to forfeit the items seized during criminal proceedings against the applicant which were discontinued. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1913
DRAFT - OVA A.S. v. Slovakia
DRAFT OVA A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 09/09/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial on account of extraordinary appeals lodged by the Prosecutor General and allowed by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7721
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
E.B. v. the Republic of Moldova
E.B. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 14/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: The case concerns disclosure of sensitive medical data about the applicant in 2010 and the refusal of the domestic courts to find a breach of her rights. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59131
E.S. v. Romania and Bulgaria
E.S. v. Romania and Bulgaria BGR ROU 19/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to respect for her family life due to the excessive length of custody proceedings in respect of her minor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39539
EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKCILERI SENDIKASI v. Turkey
EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKCILERI SENDIKASI v. Turkey TUR 25/12/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Freedom of association and freedom of expression: Disproportionate interferences due to the initiation of dissolution proceedings of a trade union EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37176
ESERTAS v. Lithuania
ESERTAS v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Breach of the principle of legal certainty by depriving of the res judicata effect a final court decision in a second set of civil proceedings concerning the same parties EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4301
EYLEM KAYA v. Turkey
EYLEM KAYA v. Turkey TUR 13/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: These cases mainly concern the systematic monitoring of the prisoners correspondence by prison authorities in particular with their lawyers Article 8 . In the Eylem Kaya EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46437
FARHAD ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan
FARHAD ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 09/02/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: Farhad Aliyev 37138/06 judgment of 09/11/2010 final on 09/02/2011 Salayev 40900/05 judgment of 09/11/2010 final on 09/02/2011 Muradverdiyev 16966/06 judgment of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1629
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FERREIRA ALVES v. Portugal
FERREIRA ALVES v. Portugal PRT 14/07/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of civil proceedings due to breach of the principle of equality of arms on account of the failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9675
FLANDIN v. France
FLANDIN v. France FRA 28/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the breach of the applicant s right to free legal assistance and lack of adequate facilities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33253
FRANKOWICZ v. Poland
FRANKOWICZ v. Poland POL 04/05/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction of a gynaecologist by medical courts as a disciplinary sanction for having prepared a critical opinion on hepatological and dermatological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17997
FREIMANIS v. Latvia
FREIMANIS v. Latvia LVA 09/05/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:34:02 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Irregularity and excessive length of detention on remand insufficiency of the reasons EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31222
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine UKR 07/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of both applicants husband and wife on account of the disproportionate use of force by the police on 7 March 2003 when EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31579
G.B. v. France
G.B. v. France FRA 02/01/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:09:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach to the principle of equality of arms in a trial before a Cour d assises as the applicant s defence counsel was not given EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32419
G.S. v. Bulgaria
G.S. v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: This case concerns a potential breach of the prohibition of torture owing to the possible corporal punishment that awaits the applicant in Iran potential violation of Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52425