Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 66
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BOCHAN v. Ukraine (No. 2)
BOCHAN v. Ukraine No. 2 UKR 05/02/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil and criminal review proceedings before the Supreme Court following initial judgments of the European Court Bochan No. 1 Yaremenko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31248
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BURZA v. Poland
BURZA v. Poland POL 18/10/2018 00:00:00 30/10/2018 16:53:51 Case Description: Excessive length of detention on remand between 2010 and 2016 due to extensions that were not justified by sufficient grounds Article 5 3 . Status of Execution: Updated action EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50673
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 16/06/2015 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: The case concerns six Azerbaijani nationals who were forced to flee from their homes during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-353
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DACTYLIDI v. Greece
DACTYLIDI v. Greece GRC 09/07/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Effective remedy and protection of property access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an effective remedy to compel authorities to enforce administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15579
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
ELIA SRL v. Italy
ELIA SRL v. Italy ITA 02/11/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities refusal to allow the applicants to build on their land on the basis of expired administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28206
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey TUR 10/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concern the failure of the national authorities to comply with numerous administrative court decisions delivered in favour of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47927
GHIGO v. Malta
GHIGO v. Malta MLT 26/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3179
GRA STIFTUNG GEGEN RASSISMUS UND ANTISEMITISMUS v. Switzerland
GRA STIFTUNG GEGEN RASSISMUS UND ANTISEMITISMUS v. Switzerland CHE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 14:29:04 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic courts order that the applicant organisation remove from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50035
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894