Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 58
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
CAM v. Turkey
CAM v. Turkey TUR 23/05/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: The case concerns violation of the right not to be discriminated against in conjunction with the right to education on account of the refusal of by the music academy to enroll a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37394
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CHENGELYAN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
CHENGELYAN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 21/07/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure by courts to respect the final character of a judgment ordering the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3931
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 16/06/2015 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: The case concerns six Azerbaijani nationals who were forced to flee from their homes during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-353
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
CUENCA ZARZOSO v. Spain
CUENCA ZARZOSO v. Spain ESP 16/04/2018 00:00:00 11/06/2018 17:16:50 Case Description: Right to private and family life home: Failure of local authorities to take action to stop excessive nocturnal noise above the permissible levels from bars pubs etc. in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49559
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DACTYLIDI v. Greece
DACTYLIDI v. Greece GRC 09/07/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Effective remedy and protection of property access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an effective remedy to compel authorities to enforce administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15579
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
GRA STIFTUNG GEGEN RASSISMUS UND ANTISEMITISMUS v. Switzerland
GRA STIFTUNG GEGEN RASSISMUS UND ANTISEMITISMUS v. Switzerland CHE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 14:29:04 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic courts order that the applicant organisation remove from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50035
HALABI v. France
HALABI v. France FRA 16/08/2019 00:00:00 26/08/2019 11:34:26 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / respect for home: Disproportionate interference of the applicant s right to respect for his home due to an urban planning inspection EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52661
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
KAREN POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
KAREN POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/06/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty by admitting the out of time appeals EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-375
KERIMAN TEKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
KERIMAN TEKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 15/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal to grant compensation for a damage occurred accidentally in the context of public construction work to the applicants building EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46109