Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 101 - 120 of 254
K. AND T. v. Finland
K. AND T. v. Finland FIN 12/07/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in public care under emergency and normal orders failure to reunite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4794
K.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
K.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 06/11/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of authorities to allow eight women of Roma ethnic origin to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8547
K.J. v. Poland
K.J. v. Poland POL 01/06/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to respect for family life on account of the authorities failure to facilitate reunion between the applicants and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20638
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway NOR 15/04/2020 00:00:00 29/04/2020 09:24:01 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decisions to only allow the applicants contact with their child four or six EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55133
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KANAL v. Turkey
KANAL v. Turkey TUR 15/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: Right to life protection of private life and lack of an effective remedy: Failure of authorities to protect the lives of the applicants or their next of kin on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52405
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland POL 03/05/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of adequate medical care in detention inadequate detention conditions or insufficient consideration of detainees state of health by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39907
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KEDZIOR v. Poland
KEDZIOR v. Poland POL 16/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of review of the lawfulness of placing and detaining a person in a care unit such as a social care home and denial of direct access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20612
KEENAN v. the United Kingdom
KEENAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/04/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Suicide of a mother s mentally ill son in prison due to lack of adequate care and due to disciplinary segregation measures imposed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2462
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
KILAVUZ v. Turkey
KILAVUZ v. Turkey TUR 21/01/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation on account of the failure of the prison authorities in their obligation to protect the right to life of the applicant s son who committed suicide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37421
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 17/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of police compliance with their duty of diligence on account of their failure to preventively confiscate a gun from a student whose internet EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56529
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine UKR 06/12/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns a number of substantial and procedural violations of the applicant s rights under Article 3 while detained on remand at the Kharkiv Regional Pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31583
KUIMOV v. Russia
KUIMOV v. Russia RUS 08/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities failure to justify severe restrictions on the applicant s access to her adoptive child during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13839
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213