Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 181 - 200 of 254
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
OYAL v. Turkey
OYAL v. Turkey TUR 23/06/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Right to life / functioning of justice / protection of private life / effective remedy: Failure of authorities to protect the lives of the applicants or their next of kin on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37334
P., C. AND S. v. the United Kingdom
P. C. AND S. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/10/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Interference due to the removal of the applicants child shortly after birth EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2670
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PATOUX v. France
PATOUX v. France FRA 14/07/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to conduct a speedy review of the lawfulness of a detention as it took the civil judge 46 days to decide on the request for immediate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33289
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 07/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to protect the biological parents right to family life due to shortcomings in the balancing exercise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55909
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PILCIC v. Croatia
PILCIC v. Croatia HRV 17/04/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention: Lack of adequate medical care for various health problems in prison. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11998
PINI AND BERTANI v. Romania
PINI AND BERTANI v. Romania ROU 22/09/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce two final court decisions by which two Italian couples had adopted two abandoned children who were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16213
PIRUZYAN v. Armenia
PIRUZYAN v. Armenia ARM 26/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:23:45 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in prison: Failure to provide adequate medical assistance in a detention facility and placement of the applicants in a metal cage during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12612
POIROT v. France
POIROT v. France FRA 15/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Dismissal of a civil party s appeal against the investigating judge s order to send a case concerning her allegation of sexual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33071
POLAT v. Austria
POLAT v. Austria AUT 20/10/2021 00:00:00 05/11/2021 13:57:21 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference on account of the postmortem examination of the applicant s baby carried out against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58807
POPOV v. Russia
POPOV v. Russia RUS 11/12/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the lack of medical assistance provided to detainees suffering from grave acute or chronic health conditions both in pre trial detention centres and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14118
PREDICA v. Romania
PREDICA v. Romania ROU 07/09/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment / electoral rights / conditions of detention: Death or ill treatment of prisoners and lack of effective investigations as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13073
PRODELALOVA v. the Czech Republic
PRODELALOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access rights to children: failure to adopt all measures reasonably expected to safeguard the applicant parents right to family life in the context of disputes EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6430
Q AND R v. Slovenia
Q AND R v. Slovenia SVN 20/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the first applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the excessively long foster care permission proceedings which commenced in 2016 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60745
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania ROU 12/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58659
R.K. AND A.K. v. the United Kingdom
R.K. AND A.K. v. the United Kingdom GBR 30/12/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy to establish a local authority s responsibility for damage suffered and to obtain compensation for taking the applicants daughter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2806
R.M.S. v. Spain
R.M.S. v. Spain ESP 18/09/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Protection of family and private life: Failure to secure the applicant s right to live with her child due to her placement in a foster family on account of the mother s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3553