Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 263
TIMOFEYEV AND POSTUPKIN v. Russia
TIMOFEYEV AND POSTUPKIN v. Russia RUS 31/05/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of free legal aid in proceedings concerning placement under administrative surveillance of the first applicant after his release EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58013
TODEV v. Bulgaria
TODEV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Violation concerns the procedure for psychiatric confinement which existed until the adoption of new Health Act in 2004 detention to undergo EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14371
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
TONKA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TONKA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 22/10/2008 00:00:00 09/11/2016 11:58:39 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment / actions of security forces: Ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33888
TOPIC v. Croatia
TOPIC v. Croatia HRV 10/01/2014 00:00:00 24/11/2016 09:09:34 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial: Dismissal by the trial court of all requests submitted by the applicant concerning evidence and acceptance all arguments and evidence submitted by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-40770
TRAFIK OIL - 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria
TRAFIK OIL 1 EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 18/05/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2021 14:55:48 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions and the absence of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57639
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TUNCAY AND OZLEM KAYA v. Turkey
TUNCAY AND OZLEM KAYA v. Turkey TUR 08/11/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention in police custody lack of a judicial remedy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28639
ULGER v. Turkey
ULGER v. Turkey TUR 28/03/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention in police custody lack of a judicial remedy to challenge the lawfulness of detention inability to claim EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28595
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria
UNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. Bulgaria BGR 13/01/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to the peaceful enjoyment of its possessions as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3914
VARADINOV v. Bulgaria
VARADINOV v. Bulgaria BGR 05/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the inability for the applicant to challenge a penalty for a road traffic offence before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48655
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VATHAKOS v. Greece
VATHAKOS v. Greece GRC 28/09/2018 00:00:00 14/02/2019 15:12:56 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the applicant s statutory inability to challenge before administrative courts the aggravated disciplinary sanction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51437
VLASENKO v. Ukraine
VLASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2022 00:00:00 04/02/2022 11:30:26 Case Description: The case concerns the prosecution authorities temporary access to the applicant s banking documents ordered in an arbitrary manner in January 2013 in the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59581
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 27/06/2018 00:00:00 24/07/2018 10:18:38 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of the second applicant the wife of the first applicant namely during an altercation on the street in 2008 with an off duty EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49883
WESOLEK v. Poland
WESOLEK v. Poland POL 13/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court on account of the refusal of the applicant s request for full exemption from court fees to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52320
WIECZOREK v. Poland
WIECZOREK v. Poland POL 08/03/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court to challenge refusal to grant legal aidwithout proper examination. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18849
WOS v. Poland
WOS v. Poland POL 08/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of judicial review of decisions taken by the Polish German Reconciliation Foundation on the claims to compensate victims of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18441
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569