Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 163
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOKY AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
KOKY AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 12/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: lack of an effective investigation into an attack by private individuals on a Roma settlement in light of the sensitive nature of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7691
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOUNOV v. Bulgaria
KOUNOV v. Bulgaria BGR 23/08/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unjustified refusal to reopen the applicant s trial after conviction in absentia. Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14365
KRIVOLUTSKAYA v. Russia
KRIVOLUTSKAYA v. Russia RUS 17/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Lack of an effective investigation of the charges of negligence against the airport s managers employees and the policemen deployed there in the wake of a terror attack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48141
LAAKSONEN v. Finland
LAAKSONEN v. Finland FIN 12/07/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the applicants right to be informed about the charges in criminal proceedings and to prepare their defence as well EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4876
LADENT v. Poland
LADENT v. Poland POL 18/06/2008 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention disproportionate to the aim of securing the proper conduct of criminal proceedings delays in release from detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39865
LEAS v. Estonia
LEAS v. Estonia EST 06/06/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lacking access to a covert surveillance file leading to the charges and conviction. Failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3105
LITSCHAUER v. the Republic of Moldova
LITSCHAUER v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention pending trial on suspicion of having committed the offence of pimping on account of running an erotic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51539
LIZASO AZCONOBIETA v. Spain
LIZASO AZCONOBIETA v. Spain ESP 28/09/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of presumption of innocence as the civil governor in a press conference after the applicant s arrest EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3545
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
M.K. v. France
M.K. v. France FRA 18/07/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Protection of private life: Collection and retention of fingerprints in the National Fingerprint database the FAED in accordance with Decree of 8 April 1987 concerning this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28459
M.M.B. v. Slovakia
M.M.B. v. Slovakia SVK 26/02/2020 00:00:00 19/03/2020 18:18:24 Case Description: Two investigations were conducted in respect of the applicant s mother s allegations that the applicant four years old at that time had been sexually abused by her father. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54929
MAESTRI AND OTHERS v. Italy
MAESTRI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The applicants were involved with other persons in criminal proceedings concerning abuse of the milk quota system introduced under Regulation EEC No. 856/84. During EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58673
MALO v. Albania
MALO v. Albania ALB 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants impossibility after having been tried in absentia and their requests for leave to appeal out of time having been accepted by the courts to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50155
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 19/07/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The seven remaining applicants in this group the former Ilgar Mammadov group are human rights defenders civil society activists and a journalist. They were all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50875
MARCELLO VIOLA v. Italy (no. 2)
MARCELLO VIOLA v. Italy no. 2 ITA 07/10/2019 00:00:00 21/10/2019 15:08:00 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the irreducibility of the applicant s whole life sentence imposed for membership of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-53045
MATTEI v. France
MATTEI v. France FRA 19/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due due to the requalification of the charges against them at a belated stage of the proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32212
MIAZDZYK v. Poland
MIAZDZYK v. Poland POL 24/04/2012 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Indefinite ban on leaving Poland imposed after release from pre trial detention pending criminal proceedings on charges of running an organised criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39917
MIHALACHE v. Romania
MIHALACHE v. Romania ROU 08/07/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:43:07 Case Description: Right not to be tried or punished twice: Breach of the ne bis in idem principle due to the higher prosecutor s decision to reopen of his own motion criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52597