Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland
A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4634
AVIS ENTREPRISES v. Greece
AVIS ENTREPRISES v. Greece GRC 03/03/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice / protection of property: Unfair expropriation proceedings as provisional compensation had been fixed without the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22156
C.N. v. the United Kingdom
C.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Domestic servitude and ineffective investigations of related complaints: inadequate legislative provisions to afford practical and effective protection against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3021
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey TUR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Inability of a father to exercise his contact rights in relation to his son during the course of excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37108
CONTRADA N° 3 v. Italy
CONTRADA N 3 v. Italy ITA 14/09/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: In this case the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 7 no punishment without law of the European Convention on Human Rights. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28312
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy ITA 24/09/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to involve parents adequately in the decision making process concerning the removal of the applicants children and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43946
E.L., R.L. AND J.O.-L. v. Switzerland
E.L. R.L. AND J.O. L. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4640
EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKCILERI SENDIKASI v. Turkey
EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKCILERI SENDIKASI v. Turkey TUR 25/12/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Freedom of association and freedom of expression: Disproportionate interferences due to the initiation of dissolution proceedings of a trade union EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37176
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
IDALOV v. Russia
IDALOV v. Russia RUS 22/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial by a Moscow court in 2003 through his removal from the courtroom for almost the entire length of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13719
KASHAVELOV v. Bulgaria
KASHAVELOV v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and efficient functioning of justice: Systematic handcuffing of a life prisoner when taken out of his cell without sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14772
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
MARPA ZEELAND B.V. ET METAL WELDING SERVICE B.V. v. the Netherlands
MARPA ZEELAND B.V. ET METAL WELDING SERVICE B.V. v. the Netherlands NLD 09/02/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to an appellate court for the applicant companies which were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4505
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
PELISSIER AND SASSI v. France
PELISSIER AND SASSI v. France FRA 25/03/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the requalification of charges by the Court of Appeal during the deliberations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32981
RACHDAD v. France
RACHDAD v. France FRA 13/02/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to a conviction by the court of appeal to an increased prison term and permanent expulsion EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33231
SOC. DI FRANCO GIANOTTI v. France
SOC. DI FRANCO GIANOTTI v. France FRA 03/08/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the rejection by the court of appeal of a request for postponement of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32985
TINNELLY & SONS LTD & MCELDUFF & OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
TINNELLY SONS LTD MCELDUFF OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/07/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the certificate issued by the Minister rejecting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2364
TRICARD v. France
TRICARD v. France FRA 10/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court in criminal proceedings due to the application of rules relating to time limits for appealing on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33141