Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 38
A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland
A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4634
ALIEV v. Ukraine
ALIEV v. Ukraine UKR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention protection of private and family life/freedom of religion and lack of a remedy: poor conditions of detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31304
AVIS ENTREPRISES v. Greece
AVIS ENTREPRISES v. Greece GRC 03/03/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice / protection of property: Unfair expropriation proceedings as provisional compensation had been fixed without the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22156
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270
BOCOS-CUESTA v. the Netherlands
BOCOS CUESTA v. the Netherlands NLD 10/02/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the impossibility for the accused to question pre trial statements given by minors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4527
C.N. v. the United Kingdom
C.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Domestic servitude and ineffective investigations of related complaints: inadequate legislative provisions to afford practical and effective protection against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3021
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey TUR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Inability of a father to exercise his contact rights in relation to his son during the course of excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37108
CONTRADA N° 3 v. Italy
CONTRADA N 3 v. Italy ITA 14/09/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: In this case the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 7 no punishment without law of the European Convention on Human Rights. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28312
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy ITA 24/09/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to involve parents adequately in the decision making process concerning the removal of the applicants children and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43946
E.L., R.L. AND J.O.-L. v. Switzerland
E.L. R.L. AND J.O. L. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4640
EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKCILERI SENDIKASI v. Turkey
EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKCILERI SENDIKASI v. Turkey TUR 25/12/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Freedom of association and freedom of expression: Disproportionate interferences due to the initiation of dissolution proceedings of a trade union EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37176
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GRZELAK v. Poland
GRZELAK v. Poland POL 22/11/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Discrimination based on religion: discriminatory treatment of an agnostic pupil due to the absence of a mark for religion/ethics in school certificates because of the failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18399
IDALOV v. Russia
IDALOV v. Russia RUS 22/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial by a Moscow court in 2003 through his removal from the courtroom for almost the entire length of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13719
KASHAVELOV v. Bulgaria
KASHAVELOV v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and efficient functioning of justice: Systematic handcuffing of a life prisoner when taken out of his cell without sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14772
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
LALLEMENT v. France
LALLEMENT v. France FRA 11/07/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to inadequate compensation paid for the expropriation of part of a farm since the expropriation affected the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33159
LECHACZYNSKI v. France
LECHACZYNSKI v. France FRA 03/08/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings concerning a tax litigation before the administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32943
MARPA ZEELAND B.V. ET METAL WELDING SERVICE B.V. v. the Netherlands
MARPA ZEELAND B.V. ET METAL WELDING SERVICE B.V. v. the Netherlands NLD 09/02/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to an appellate court for the applicant companies which were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4505
O'HARA v. the United Kingdom
O HARA v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lacking promptness for being brought before a judge upon arrest and the lack of availability of an enforceable right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2558