Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 74
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. Ukraine
ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: The case concerns the condemnation of a journalist in civil defamation proceedings for publishing an allegedly defamatory article published about judges in 2005 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62238
ANTICA AND SC R SA v. Romania
ANTICA AND SC R SA v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Unfair civil proceedings for defamation and disproportionate interference with freedom of expression: Lack of reasoning of the court decisions holding both EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16579
AQUILINA AND OTHERS v. Malta
AQUILINA AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 14/09/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to damages granted in the defamation proceedings. Status of Execution: The defamation proceedings were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4103
ARMONIENE v. Lithuania
ARMONIENE v. Lithuania LTU 25/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure to protect private lives due to the award of only a derisory sum in respect of non pecuniary damages in defamation proceedings brought EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4235
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Excessive length of civil labour criminal and enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5038
AURELIAN OPREA v. Romania
AURELIAN OPREA v. Romania ROU 19/04/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Freedom of expression: disproportionate interference due to the substantial amount of civil damages the applicant was ordered to pay to the plaintiff in defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13401
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Supreme Court s failure to award to the applicants as victims of defamation a proportionate compensation for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6852
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland ISL 10/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to convictions of the applicant journalists in civil defamation proceedings brought against them on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-71
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BOLDEA v. Romania
BOLDEA v. Romania ROU 15/05/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and freedom of expression: Unfair criminal proceedings for insult and defamation resulting in criminal convictions and/or award EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16319
BOZHKOV v. Bulgaria
BOZHKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 19/07/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the freedom of expression of the applicants journalists as a result of their convictions to administrative penalty in criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1909
CHEMODUROV v. Russia
CHEMODUROV v. Russia RUS 31/10/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violations of the right to freedom of expression of the applicants mainly journalists in civil defamation and criminal proceedings due notably to the lack of distinction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13597
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine UKR 05/08/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the court ordering a newspaper s editorial board and its editor in chief to apologise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31614
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression violations of Article 10 of the applicant journalists due in particular in both cases to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1727
FLUX (NO. 2) v. the Republic of Moldova
FLUX NO. 2 v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 03/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interferences as a result of court decisions holding the applicants newspapers and journalists liable in tort for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6656