Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 53
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
BALAZS v. Hungary
BALAZS v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning violations of the prohibition of discrimination read in conjunction with the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10593
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARMAXIZOGLOU AND OTHERS v. Greece
BARMAXIZOGLOU AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 01/12/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: This case concerns certain applicants discrimination on account of their inability as same sex couples to form civil unions as was the case with different sex EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61996
BASU v. Germany
BASU v. Germany DEU 18/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to ascertain through an independent body that an effective investigation is carried out by the State authorities into the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62530
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BRAUER v. Germany
BRAUER v. Germany DEU 28/08/2009 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Discriminatory interference with the right to family life in that the applicant born out of wedlock was unable to assert her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38440
BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. Bulgaria
BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. Bulgaria BGR 16/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: These cases concern the failure of domestic courts to discharge a positive obligation to afford redress to persons of Jewish and Roma origin for anti Semitic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57681
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands NLD 03/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Impossibility to establish retroactively the applicant s relationship with his late father who died before he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4469
CEGOLEA v. Romania
CEGOLEA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: In Romania the Constitution reserves one seat in the Chamber of Deputies to each national minority whose organisations do not attain the electoral threshold. This case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55723
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
CUSAN AND FAZZO v. Italy
CUSAN AND FAZZO v. Italy ITA 07/04/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private and family life: Impossibility under domestic law to register a married couple s legitimate child at birth in the civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28246
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
EMEL BOYRAZ v. Turkey
EMEL BOYRAZ v. Turkey TUR 02/03/2015 00:00:00 15/11/2016 11:24:36 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of sex and access to and efficient functioning of justice: dismissal of a woman from her post as security officer on the ground that she did EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38024
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GLOR v. Switzerland
GLOR v. Switzerland CHE 06/11/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant on the ground of his disability being required to pay a tax for exemption from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5842
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
IVANOVA v. Bulgaria
IVANOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 12/07/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Dismissal of the applicant whose functions did not include teaching from a state owned school motivated by religious considerations as part of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14649
J.M. v. the United Kingdom
J.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/12/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of sex: The applicant in a same sex relationship could not benefit from the same reduction in child maintenance payments as she would EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2901