Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 222
A.B. v. Slovakia
A.B. v. Slovakia SVK 04/06/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to present one s case on equal terms with the defendant in that without a formal and reasoned decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7855
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece GRC 04/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22158
AGACHE AND OTHERS v. Romania
AGACHE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 20/01/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Ineffectiveness of investigations into the death of the applicants relative a police officer killed in the 1989 anti communist demonstrations: Length of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17506
ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. Portugal
ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. Portugal PRT 04/07/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and enforcement proceedings before the courts of first instance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47457
ALMEIDA SANTOS v. Portugal
ALMEIDA SANTOS v. Portugal PRT 06/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of civil proceedings and infringement of principle of equality of arms due to lackingpossibility as enjoyed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9701
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
AMIRKHANYAN v. Armenia
AMIRKHANYAN v. Armenia ARM 03/03/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Violation of the principle of res judicata finality of judgments following second appeals on points of law without any EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-369
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. Bulgaria
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 26/10/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective investigations into deaths rapes or alleged ill treatment perpetrated by private EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3793
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia RUS 29/06/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty through quashing of a binding and enforceable judgment by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27544
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Excessive length of civil labour criminal and enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5038
BAJIC v. Croatia
BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKAN v. Turkey
BAKAN v. Turkey TUR 12/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusals by administrative courts to grant legal aid on the ground that actions were ill founded or that applicants failed to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37358
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania (no 1)
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania no 1 ROU 05/01/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Abuse suffered by the applicants or their relatives in police custody or upon arrest ineffectiveness of related criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17496