Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 30
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 23/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Supreme Court s dismissal of the applicants amparo appeals concerning the calculation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51361
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
BURZA v. Poland
BURZA v. Poland POL 18/10/2018 00:00:00 30/10/2018 16:53:51 Case Description: Excessive length of detention on remand between 2010 and 2016 due to extensions that were not justified by sufficient grounds Article 5 3 . Status of Execution: Updated action EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50673
BUSINESS SI INVESTITII PENTRU TOTI v. the Republic of Moldova
BUSINESS SI INVESTITII PENTRU TOTI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Group of cases concerning the violation of the applicants right to access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to consider EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7001
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CHE 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of the Social Insurance Tribunal to send to the applicant the observations of the opposing party concerning his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46747
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
DOKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3137
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland CHE 11/06/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Restriction of the applicant s access to court on account of the ten year limitation period for asbestos related EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5878
I.S. v. Slovakia
I.S. v. Slovakia SVK 04/04/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7801
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KORMACHEVA v. Russia
KORMACHEVA v. Russia RUS 14/06/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in this respect as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13541
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KOYCHEV v. Bulgaria
KOYCHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 13/01/2021 00:00:00 09/03/2021 15:06:29 Case Description: This case concerns the dismissal in 2016 of an action challenging paternity on the grounds of the interests of the child who had been recognised by the mother s husband EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56823
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden SWE 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy in the context of protection of private and family life: Denial of locus standi in proceedings concerning the Tax Agency EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47071
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 24/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:11:36 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3435
MERIT v. Ukraine
MERIT v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31316