Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 21
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
BATKIVSKA TURBOTA FOUNDATION v. Ukraine
BATKIVSKA TURBOTA FOUNDATION v. Ukraine UKR 09/01/2019 00:00:00 27/02/2019 14:15:25 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Serious doubts as to the lawfulness of the annulment of the applicant foundation s title to a property in court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51639
BUSCEMI v. Italy
BUSCEMI v. Italy ITA 16/09/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair custody proceedings concerning the applicant s daughter due to the Youth Court President s public statements justifying EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45104
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
CESNIEKS v. Latvia
CESNIEKS v. Latvia LVA 11/05/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the use of evidence obtained through ill treatment of the accused. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12662
CHMELIR v. the Czech Republic
CHMELIR v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/10/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Justified doubts with regard to the objective impartiality of a High Court judge who in a second set of proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6088
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability of the applicant to challenge the lawfulness of his continued detention for compulsory medical treatment in the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31314
HORVATIC v. Croatia
HORVATIC v. Croatia HRV 17/01/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the inability of the accused to challenge the manner in which forensic evidence was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10321
JUSIC v. Switzerland
JUSIC v. Switzerland CHE 02/03/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / expulsion: Unlawful detention of a rejected asylum seeker with a view to his deportation due to the national authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4748
KAMINSKIENE v. Lithuania
KAMINSKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 12/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Objectively justified doubts concerning the impartiality of two judges in a Supreme Court selection panel with regard to the applicant s two EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56661
KORZENIAK v. Poland
KORZENIAK v. Poland POL 10/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:21:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Objectively justified doubts as to the impartiality of the Supreme Court due to the participation on one judge who had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46727
KOULIAS v. Cyprus
KOULIAS v. Cyprus CYP 26/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to objectively justified doubts regarding the impartiality of the Supreme Court s presiding judge in civil defamation proceedings as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55839
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LE STUM v. France
LE STUM v. France FRA 04/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Legitimate doubts on the court s impartiality in proceedings against a bank manager for company management failures the court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33021
NICHOLAS v. Cyprus
NICHOLAS v. Cyprus CYP 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 10:12:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Objectively justified doubts on impartiality of the judge deciding on an appeal in law relationship with the managing partner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49515
PAIXAO MOREIRA SA FERNANDES v. Portugal
PAIXAO MOREIRA SA FERNANDES v. Portugal PRT 28/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the court of appeal which had convicted the applicant for the first time at second instance had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55361
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 11/10/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Right to liberty functioning of justice: Unlawful administrative detention without a court order and excessively lengthy detention on remand unfair criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33465
SACILOR-LORMINES v. France
SACILOR LORMINES v. France FRA 09/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to objective doubts on the impartiality and independence of the bench of the Conseil d Etat EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33227
SORGIC v. Serbia
SORGIC v. Serbia SRB 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: legitimate doubts on the impartiality of a tribunal with two judges sitting on the bench in the adjudication of a case despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7053