Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 17/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of police compliance with their duty of diligence on account of their failure to preventively confiscate a gun from a student whose internet EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56529
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
MELNIK v. Ukraine
MELNIK v. Ukraine UKR 28/06/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31318
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
SUKACHOV v. Ukraine
SUKACHOV v. Ukraine UKR 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55367
VIRABYAN v. Armenia
VIRABYAN v. Armenia ARM 02/01/2013 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: These cases concern substantive and procedural violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention 1 on account of the applicants death or torture and the lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-355
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
ZLINSAT, SPOL. S R.O. v. Bulgaria
ZLINSAT SPOL. S R.O. v. Bulgaria BGR 15/09/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unjustified interference due to the suspension of the privatisation of and eviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3791