Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 87 of 87
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
VARNAS v. Lithuania
VARNAS v. Lithuania LTU 09/12/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Discrimination: Unjustified difference in treatment of remand prisoners compared to convicted prisoners as regards conjugal visits. Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4338
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern mainly deaths ill treatment including torture and lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention or in penitentiary facilities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3593
VOOL AND TOOMIK v. Estonia
VOOL AND TOOMIK v. Estonia EST 29/06/2022 00:00:00 18/07/2022 12:59:58 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified difference in treatment as concerns long term visits of the applicants as persons in pre trial detention between 2011 and 2016 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60753
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg LUX 28/09/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Protection of family life access to and efficient functioning of justice and discrimination: Refusal to enforce a full adoption order by a foreign court in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-117
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
YILTAS YILDIZ TURISTIK TESISLERI A.S. v. Turkey
YILTAS YILDIZ TURISTIK TESISLERI A.S. v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the unreasonably low amount of compensation compared to the value of the property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5494