Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
DURDEVIC v. Croatia
DURDEVIC v. Croatia HRV 19/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure of police and prosecuting authorities to conduct an effective and independent investigation into allegations of ill treatment of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10119
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to life on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicants relatives the G mi and others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37220
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
MIROSLAVA TODOROVA v. Bulgaria
MIROSLAVA TODOROVA v. Bulgaria BGR 19/01/2022 00:00:00 04/02/2022 11:30:26 Case Description: The case concerns disciplinary proceedings and sanctions in 2011 2015 imposed by the Supreme Judicial Council the SJC against the applicant a judge who in her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59583
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/12/2018 00:00:00 16/01/2019 17:03:19 Case Description: In the present cases the Court found various violations of Articles 3 5 6 11 and 13 of the Convention in the context of the dispersal by the authorities of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51167
OFERTA PLUS SRL v. the Republic of Moldova
OFERTA PLUS SRL v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 23/05/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property / Right to petition: Failure to enforce a judgment as well as subsequent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6804
PANYIK v. Hungary
PANYIK v. Hungary HUN 12/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the applicant s legitimate doubt as to the impartiality of the tribunal as the judge in charge of the appeal had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10975
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
PINTAR AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to introduce remedies that would provide the applicants with a reasonable opportunity to challenge the Bank of Slovenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59299
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703