Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 361 - 380 of 985
GUTA TUDOR TEODORESCU v. Romania
GUTA TUDOR TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 05/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal of domestic courts to grant a claim for an adjustment of the compensation for property taken over under the Treaty of Craiova of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13155
HADZAJLIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
HADZAJLIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 16/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of civil and administrative proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54677
HAGIESCU AND OTHERS v. Romania
HAGIESCU AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 13/02/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Denial of access to a court and interference with property rights: Action for recovery of possession of nationalized property had been dismissed without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16293
HAKAN ARI v. Turkey
HAKAN ARI v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to property on account of the fact that the authorities denied the applicant a building permit because his land had been earmarked EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37112
HAKOBYAN AND AMIRKHANYAN v. Armenia
HAKOBYAN AND AMIRKHANYAN v. Armenia ARM 17/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 10:43:07 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful expropriation due to non compliance with conditions provided for by law as required by the Constitution but only EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54719
HALIT DINC AND OTHERS v. Turkey
HALIT DINC AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 19/12/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Right to life: Authorities failure to protect in 1994 the applicants next of kin from manifestly excessive and potentially lethal force during military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37202
HAMMERN v. Norway
HAMMERN v. Norway NOR 11/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence in that suspicions were expressed in a court decision dealing with compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-181
HAMMERTON v. the United Kingdom
HAMMERTON v. the United Kingdom GBR 12/09/2016 00:00:00 25/03/2021 14:13:11 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil contempt of court proceedings due to the lack of legal representation which resulted in the applicant s imprisonment for six EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39267
HAMSIOGLU v. Turkey
HAMSIOGLU v. Turkey TUR 19/05/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Continued unlawful detention despite release order delivered by domestic court and lack of a remedy allowing to obtain compensation Status of Execution: The National EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5620
HARKMANN v. Estonia
HARKMANN v. Estonia EST 11/10/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Denial of the applicants right to be brought promptly before a judge following arrest and lack of an enforceable right to compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3073
HATTATOGLU v. Turkey
HATTATOGLU v. Turkey TUR 26/06/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28777
HELSINKI COMMITTEE OF ARMENIA v. Armenia
HELSINKI COMMITTEE OF ARMENIA v. Armenia ARM 30/06/2015 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unjustified interference on account of the ban of a duly notified peaceful march as well as the absence of a timely notification EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-373
HIKMET TOPAL v. Turkey
HIKMET TOPAL v. Turkey TUR 12/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment / actions of security forces: Ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51497
HIRST v. the United Kingdom
HIRST v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/10/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive interval between the reviews concerning the applicants continued detention as discretionary life prisoners and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2600
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands NLD 03/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the Court of Appeal s refusal to consider measures that would have enabled the applicant who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47531
HORVAT v. Croatia
HORVAT v. Croatia HRV 26/10/2001 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of an effective remedy. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12145
HORVATH v. Slovakia
HORVATH v. Slovakia SVK 27/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of proceedings related to the applicants requests for release from detention on remand. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8291
HOUTMAN AND MEEUS v. Belgium
HOUTMAN AND MEEUS v. Belgium BEL 17/06/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified refusal by domestic courts of compensation for unlawful psychiatric confinement despite the acknowledgment of its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1557
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland CHE 11/06/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Restriction of the applicant s access to court on account of the ten year limitation period for asbestos related EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5878
HULEA v. Romania
HULEA v. Romania ROU 02/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal by competent court to award compensation for the non pecuniary damage caused by the national authorities rejection of a male army employee s request for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16901