Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 921 - 940 of 985
VILNES AND OTHERS v. Norway
VILNES AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 24/03/2014 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Failure by the State to fulfil the positive obligation to respect for family life by ensuring that the applicants divers engaged in diving operations in the North EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-215
VIRA DOVZHENKO v. Ukraine
VIRA DOVZHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful and disproportionate interference to the subsequent letting of a plot of agricultural land to which the applicant had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52401
VISAN v. Romania
VISAN v. Romania ROU 24/07/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the dismissal of a request for compensation for unlawful conviction under the Civil Code on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16499
VISKUPOVA AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
VISKUPOVA AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 11/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Lack of access to a court: Non enforcement of a final judgment granting compensation for the State owned enterprise using the applicants property on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8223
VISTINS AND PEREPJOLKINS v. Latvia
VISTINS AND PEREPJOLKINS v. Latvia LVA 25/10/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Interference with property rights: Extreme disproportion between the official cadastral value of the land and the actual compensation received for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31102
VLAD v. Romania
VLAD v. Romania ROU 26/02/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: 1 These cases concern the excessive length of civil Nicolau group and criminal proceedings Stoianova and Nedelcu group and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13259
VOD BAUR IMPEX S.R.L. v. Romania
VOD BAUR IMPEX S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 26/07/2022 00:00:00 19/08/2022 09:42:37 Case Description: This case concerns the domestic courts failure to strike a fair balance between competing interests due to the rigid manner of adjudicating the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60963
VOLODINA v. Russia
VOLODINA v. Russia RUS 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54227
VOLODINA v. Russia (no. 2)
VOLODINA v. Russia no. 2 RUS 14/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59319
VOLODYA AVETISYAN v. Armenia
VOLODYA AVETISYAN v. Armenia ARM 03/08/2022 00:00:00 19/08/2022 09:42:37 Case Description: This case concerns inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention kept in pest ridden poorly ventilated and overcrowded cells exposed to secondary smoking and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60967
VOLOKITIN AND OTHERS v. Russia
VOLOKITIN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 03/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: This case concerns the State s failure to redeem the 1982 State loan bonds which are in the applicants possession. The Court observed that in 1995 Russia had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50975
VOSKOBOYNIKOV v. Ukraine
VOSKOBOYNIKOV v. Ukraine UKR 05/10/2017 00:00:00 09/10/2017 10:54:50 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence / protection of property rights / lack of a remedy: Various irregularities related to searches and seizure to interception EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47863
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 27/06/2018 00:00:00 24/07/2018 10:18:38 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of the second applicant the wife of the first applicant namely during an altercation on the street in 2008 with an off duty EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49883
VRENCEV v. Serbia
VRENCEV v. Serbia SRB 23/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention in police custody failure to consider any alternative for detention on remand unlawfulness of detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7022
VUKOVIC v. Croatia
VUKOVIC v. Croatia HRV 15/11/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the seizure of the applicant s vehicle in the context of a criminal investigation and its prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50825
W.P. v. Germany
W.P. v. Germany DEU 06/01/2017 00:00:00 25/04/2017 09:13:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful preventive detention acknowledged by unilateral declaration of the government. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46699
W. v. Slovenia
W. v. Slovenia SVN 23/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Authorities failure to ensure effective trial concerning rape and sexual assault charges due to long delays adjournments of hearings and a lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7368
WAITE v. the United Kingdom
WAITE v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/03/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of an oral hearing and an adversarial procedure before the Parole Board in proceedings concerning the revocation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2660
WATSON v. the United Kingdom
WATSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/06/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Delay in reviewing the lawfulness of the applicant s detention after the expiry of his tariff of 15 years and impossibility to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2370
WEISSMAN AND OTHERS v. Romania
WEISSMAN AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 23/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of access to a court due to excessive court fees required for initiating EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16173