Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 361 - 373 of 373
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 05/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to protect the life of a woman who was a victim of domestic violence had filed several complaints stating that she feared for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61103
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YETKINSEKERCI v. the United Kingdom
YETKINSEKERCI v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/02/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2610
YURTSEVER v. Turkey (II)
YURTSEVER v. Turkey II TUR 20/04/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression and to receive information: unlawful refusal of prison authorities to provide detainees with a daily newspaper published in Kurdish. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37116
YUSUPOVA v. Russia
YUSUPOVA v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46595
Z.W. v. the United Kingdom
Z.W. v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and lack of a remedy: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant s welfare while she was in foster care and lack of a redress EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2530
ZABELIN AND ZABELINA v. Russia
ZABELIN AND ZABELINA v. Russia RUS 04/10/2016 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:16:01 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the applicants right to freedom of movement on account of the removal of their travel documents without a basis in domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5652
ZALYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia
ZALYAN AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 17/06/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 14:23:52 Case Description: The case concerns the ineffectiveness of the investigations carried out into complaints by three former Armenian servicemen that they had been tortured and ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-377
ZAMMIT AND ATTARD CASSAR v. Malta
ZAMMIT AND ATTARD CASSAR v. Malta MLT 30/10/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases concern the disproportionate control of the applicants use of their property resulting from the application of the Re letting of Urban Property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3187
ZBOROVSKY v. Slovakia
ZBOROVSKY v. Slovakia SVK 23/01/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Lack of access to court in proceedings brought against a State owned enterprise due rejection of appeal on points of law as well as two constitutional complaints without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8027
ZEMAN v. Austria
ZEMAN v. Austria AUT 29/09/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment as a result of the application of the amended Pension and Pension Allowance Act according to which widowers EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1049
ZHUK v. Ukraine
ZHUK v. Ukraine UKR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms on the grounds of the applicants inability to participate in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31638
ZHVAVYY v. Ukraine
ZHVAVYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/09/2022 00:00:00 26/09/2022 09:53:59 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive and disproportionate burden placed on the applicant as a result of civil defamation proceedings initiated against him in 2012 for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61203