Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 41
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
ADEISHVILI (MAZMISHVILI) v. Russia
ADEISHVILI MAZMISHVILI v. Russia RUS 16/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant on account of the overcrowded conditions of his detention in the special detention centre for foreigners in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14044
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
BEIAN v. Romania
BEIAN v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Unfairness of civil proceedings: Inconsistency in the domestic courts case law absence of a mechanism ensuring uniform interpretation of applicable legal provision and case law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17421
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protect the lives of the applicants relatives from a person who had been previously convicted of threatening to kill them Branko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10317
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
C.N. v. the United Kingdom
C.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Domestic servitude and ineffective investigations of related complaints: inadequate legislative provisions to afford practical and effective protection against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3021
CENBAUER v. Croatia
CENBAUER v. Croatia HRV 13/09/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention and lack of an effective remedy: Inadequate prison conditions due inter alia to overcrowding poor state of repair EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10073
CUMHURIYETCI EGITIM VE KULTUR MERKEZI VAKFI v. Turkey
CUMHURIYETCI EGITIM VE KULTUR MERKEZI VAKFI v. Turkey TUR 20/04/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37258
DYBEKU v. Albania
DYBEKU v. Albania ALB 02/06/2008 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention/against ill treatment: Ill treatment suffered due to lack of appropriate medical treatment in prison during seriously illness Indication EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-341
FILIP v. Romania
FILIP v. Romania ROU 14/03/2007 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and against ill treatment: unlawful psychiatric confinement ordered by the prosecutor in view of a forced psychiatric examination or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13451
GETZOV v. Bulgaria
GETZOV v. Bulgaria BGR 04/06/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Unlawful placement in a psychiatric institution: on the order of a prosecutor without prior medical advice for the purpose of determining whether he needed compulsory EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14511
GHIGO v. Malta
GHIGO v. Malta MLT 26/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3179
GOROBET v. the Republic of Moldova
GOROBET v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Unlawful and arbitrary detention of the applicant on account of his compulsory confinement against his will in the B l i psychiatric hospital in February 2008 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6914
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine
GORSHKOV v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability of the applicant to challenge the lawfulness of his continued detention for compulsory medical treatment in the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31314