Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 24
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ANAGNOSTAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
ANAGNOSTAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 23/12/2021 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life due to the unreasonably delayed proceedings concerning in Anagnostakis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59399
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. Bulgaria
BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. Bulgaria BGR 16/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: These cases concern the failure of domestic courts to discharge a positive obligation to afford redress to persons of Jewish and Roma origin for anti Semitic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57681
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37402
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KIYUTIN v. Russia
KIYUTIN v. Russia RUS 15/09/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Discriminatory refusal of residence permits to foreign nationals on account of their HIV positive status the law permitting no individualised evaluation of their capacities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14026
LARKOS v. Cyprus
LARKOS v. Cyprus CYP 18/02/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to protection of private life and home: Unlawful discriminatory treatment of a government tenant living in an area regulated by the Rent Control Law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1966
LINGURAR v. Romania
LINGURAR v. Romania ROU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate use of force against the applicants during a police raid on a Roma 1 community in 2011 an operation found by the Court to disclose EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51929
NELSON v. the United Kingdom
NELSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 01/07/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory interference due to authorities refusal to pay widowers social security benefits available to women in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2814
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/12/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern discrimination against the applicants on account of their ineligibility to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3141
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703