Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ALI RIZA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ALI RIZA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 22/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of Article 6 1 right to a fair hearing of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the lack of independence and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55551
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
FELIX GUTU v. the Republic of Moldova
FELIX GUTU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/01/2021 00:00:00 15/02/2021 16:49:34 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to the presumption of innocence in 2006 because of his dismissal for theft based on evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56679
GUBERINA v. Croatia
GUBERINA v. Croatia HRV 12/09/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Discrimination: Failure of authorities to provide objective and reasonable justification for their lack of consideration of the inequality related to the needs of a child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10175
HADZAJLIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
HADZAJLIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 16/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of civil and administrative proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54677
HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH (METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY) v. Bulgaria
HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY v. Bulgaria BGR 05/06/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Unjustified interference in the organisational autonomy of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church by the authorities by way EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3839
KOVACHEV v. Bulgaria
KOVACHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 02/03/1998 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of fair civil proceedings due to the denial of a hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal concerning the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14271
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 08/07/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: This group of 25 cases concerns violations of the right to free elections Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of members of opposition parties or independent candidates in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1773
OLUIC v. Croatia
OLUIC v. Croatia HRV 20/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life/home: Failure of authorities to take action to deal with the applicants exposure to night time excessive noise coming from nearby bars inadequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10105
RAFFI v. France
RAFFI v. France FRA 13/09/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy/ Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32871
SHAW v. Hungary
SHAW v. Hungary HUN 26/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10523
STANKA MIRKOVIC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro
STANKA MIRKOVIC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro MNE 07/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings concerning the expropriation of land from the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47283
SULCAS v. Lithuania
SULCAS v. Lithuania LTU 05/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings lack of an effective remedy Status of Execution: As far as the effective domestic compensatory remedy with regard to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4267
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
VLAD v. Romania
VLAD v. Romania ROU 26/02/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: 1 These cases concern the excessive length of civil Nicolau group and criminal proceedings Stoianova and Nedelcu group and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13259
VUKOTA-BOJIC v. Switzerland
VUKOTA BOJIC v. Switzerland CHE 18/01/2017 00:00:00 13/04/2017 16:28:22 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to secret surveillance of a social insurance claimant by private investigators without sufficient legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46669