Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
ALBERTI v. Italy
ALBERTI v. Italy ITA 24/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of the applicants by law enforcement agents in the context of their arrest and ineffectiveness the ensuing criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28300
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BURES v. the Czech Republic
BURES v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/01/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:15:20 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Restraint and fastening of the applicant to a bed at Brno ernovice psychiatric hospital s sobering up centre and insufficiently EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35
CALMANOVICI v. Romania
CALMANOVICI v. Romania ROU 01/10/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Cases mainly concerning irregularities of detention: unjustified extension of the detention on remand lack of immediate appeal against court decisions extending detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16415
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
GALLARDO SANCHEZ v. Italy
GALLARDO SANCHEZ v. Italy ITA 24/06/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified detention caused by significant delays occurred at various stages of an extradition procedure concerning a Venezuelan EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28250
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GHIURAU v. Romania
GHIURAU v. Romania ROU 29/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13121
GUBACSI v. Hungary
GUBACSI v. Hungary HUN 28/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns ill treatment between 2000 and 2016 by law enforcement officers during the applicants arrest transfer and detention and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10515
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. Russia (no.2)
KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. Russia no.2 RUS 14/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: This case concerns the second trial of Yukos former executives on charges of misappropriation or embezzlement of oil and of laundering the unlawfully EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55163
KIM v. Russia
KIM v. Russia RUS 17/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns different violations related to the detention of stateless or foreign national applicants between 2010 and 2020 pending administrative removal from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14160
KOPP v. Switzerland
KOPP v. Switzerland CHE 25/03/1998 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful interference due to the lack of predictability of domestic legislation concerning the monitoring of telephone lines EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4648
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213