Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 63
A.S. v. Finland
A.S. v. Finland FIN 28/12/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of adequate opportunity to put questions to the minor victim of an offence with respect to the latter s videotaped account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5956
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia ARM 15/09/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Ashot Harutynyan 34334/04 final on 15/09/2010 Jhangiryan 44765/08 final on 18/05/2021 Shirkhanyan 54547/16 final on 22/05/2022 Voskanyan 623/13 final on 24/01/2023 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-349
AYDEMIR v. Turkey
AYDEMIR v. Turkey TUR 24/08/2011 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of home: Vague wording of a search warrant providing no information on the reason for the measure or the objects sought thus not allowing any review of the warrant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5622
BATALINY v. Russia
BATALINY v. Russia RUS 14/12/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the first applicant on account of his forced psychiatric treatment in the absence of an established medical need EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13974
BEIERE v. Latvia
BEIERE v. Latvia LVA 29/02/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure of domestic courts to offer in the context of criminal sufficient protection against an arbitrary detention in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12658
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 10/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference by a Customs Department order closing the applicant company duty free business located inside the Leu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6778
BIZIUK v. Poland (no. 2)
BIZIUK v. Poland no. 2 POL 17/04/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention due to lack of evidence that the applicant s mental condition necessitated his confinement in psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18985
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
DANEV v. Bulgaria
DANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 02/12/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Dismissal of a claim for non pecuniary damage for unlawful detention on excessively formalistic grounds as the domestic court required to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14852
DANIS AND THE ASSOCIATION OF ETHNIC TURKS v. Romania
DANIS AND THE ASSOCIATION OF ETHNIC TURKS v. Romania ROU 21/07/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Electoral rights and discrimination: Entry into force 7 months before the parliamentary elections 2008 of a new legal eligibility condition EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17603
EMEL BOYRAZ v. Turkey
EMEL BOYRAZ v. Turkey TUR 02/03/2015 00:00:00 15/11/2016 11:24:36 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of sex and access to and efficient functioning of justice: dismissal of a woman from her post as security officer on the ground that she did EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38024
FRODL v. Austria
FRODL v. Austria AUT 04/10/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Electoral rights: Disproportionate disenfranchisement of a detainee sentenced to life imprisonment as domestic legislation National Assembly Election Act did not meet all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-997
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified interferences with the freedom of expression as a result of court decisions delivered in 2008 and 2017 respectively holding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47937
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
HENRIOUD v. France
HENRIOUD v. France FRA 05/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 12:05:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive formalism of the Court of Cassation which declared inadmissible the applicant s appeal on the ground of non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33417