Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 42
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ALICAN DEMIR v. Turkey
ALICAN DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 25/05/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Delay in the domestic court s decision on a detainee s conditional release 20 days after he had fulfilled all conditions and lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37348
ALVER v. Estonia
ALVER v. Estonia EST 08/02/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Detention on remand in Tallinn Central Prison and J geva District Arrest House in conditions of overcrowding absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3067
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
AVCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AVCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention: ill treatment on account of disproportionate restraint measures taken to prevent detainees from absconding during their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37409
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 10/11/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property of home and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to the denial of access to the applicants property in South East Turkey on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5572
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania
GHIULFER PREDESCU v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified interferences with the freedom of expression as a result of court decisions delivered in 2008 and 2017 respectively holding EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47937
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 15/01/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The majority of the cases in this group concern deaths torture ill treatment excessive use of force or lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3943
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
K.A. v. Finland
K.A. v. Finland FIN 14/04/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take adequate measures to reunite the applicant parents and their three children following the children s placement in a foster family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4798
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia RUS 22/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the discrimination of the applicants military serviceman and police officers on account of different conditions for parental leave based on their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13956
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213