Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 381 - 400 of 541
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PFEIFER v. Bulgaria
PFEIFER v. Bulgaria BGR 17/05/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Restriction of freedom of movement by travel ban pending criminal proceedings: Failure by authorities to justify throughout the whole duration of the travel ban the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14421
PLASSE-BAUER v. France
PLASSE BAUER v. France FRA 28/05/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:59:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of sufficient efforts to enforce a domestic court decision awarding visiting rights to a mother and laying down the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31804
PLOTNICOVA v. the Republic of Moldova
PLOTNICOVA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/08/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to a fair hearing in criminal proceedings against her lasting from 2003 06 on two accounts: absence of any decision by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7156
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN AND BAGHDASARYAN v. Armenia ARM 12/09/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Lack of effective remedy under Armenian law to apply for compensation for the non pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant in connection with his ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-459
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
PONUSHKOV v. Russia
PONUSHKOV v. Russia RUS 06/02/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violation of the right to individual petition Article 34 or to private life Article 8 on account of perusal of the applicants correspondence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13833
POPOV v. Russia
POPOV v. Russia RUS 11/12/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the lack of medical assistance provided to detainees suffering from grave acute or chronic health conditions both in pre trial detention centres and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14118
POPOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova
POPOVICI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 02/06/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of two cases concerns the violation of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of the Supreme Court s quashing of their acquittals and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6668
PRADO BUGALLO v. Spain
PRADO BUGALLO v. Spain ESP 18/05/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to interception of the applicant s telephone communication in the context of criminal investigations on the ground EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3485
PREDICA v. Romania
PREDICA v. Romania ROU 07/09/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment / electoral rights / conditions of detention: Death or ill treatment of prisoners and lack of effective investigations as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13073
PRICE v. the United Kingdom
PRICE v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/10/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and conditions of detention: Degrading treatment suffered by a four limb deficient thalidomide victim dependent on a wheelchair EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2524
PROVENZANO v. Italy
PROVENZANO v. Italy ITA 25/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: The applicant was detained under the special prison regime provided for by section 41 bis of the Prison Administration Act. He suffered from a number of chronic medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51353
PRPIC v. Croatia
PRPIC v. Croatia HRV 09/02/2023 00:00:00 13/02/2023 14:31:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant on account of poor conditions of detention in the Zagreb Prison in 2011 and in the Po ega State Prison in 2011 2013 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62621
PYRANTIENE v. Lithuania
PYRANTIENE v. Lithuania LTU 12/02/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Significant disproportion between the compensation awarded for the deprivation of land by the authorities and the land s market value deprivation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4305
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania ROU 12/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58659
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the asylum seeking applicants reception conditions in the R szke transit zone for almost four months in 2017 which were incompatible with Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58097
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596