Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 401 - 420 of 532
RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. Azerbaijan
RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAH S WITNESSES v. Azerbaijan AZE 20/06/2020 00:00:00 29/06/2020 11:35:05 Case Description: The case of Religious Community of Jehovah s Witnesses concerns a violation of the applicant community s freedom of expression on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55457
RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. Slovakia (no. 4)
RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA A.S. v. Slovakia no. 4 SVK 23/12/2021 00:00:00 27/01/2022 16:01:33 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate imposition of administrative fine in 2012 2015 on a multimedia publishing house by the Slovak EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59483
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
ROTH v. Germany
ROTH v. Germany DEU 22/01/2021 00:00:00 15/02/2021 16:49:34 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s degrading treatment on account of eleven intrusive strip searches he was subjected to in 2014 2017 prior to or after receiving visitors in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56713
S.B. v. Romania
S.B. v. Romania ROU 23/12/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:23:17 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of opportunity to establish whether the applicant s dental treatment had constituted medical negligence and to obtain appropriate redress as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14219
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania ROU 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions of the applicant a privatised company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52979
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the recalculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54303
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to ensure the effectiveness of available procedural safeguards and to act with appropriate due diligence in managing and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48329
S.S. BALIKLICESME BELDESI TAR. KAL. KOOPERATIFI v. Turkey
S.S. BALIKLICESME BELDESI TAR. KAL. KOOPERATIFI v. Turkey TUR 28/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:57:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts failure to provide a copy of the written opinion of Public Prosecutor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33393
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SABER v. Norway
SABER v. Norway NOR 17/03/2021 00:00:00 12/04/2021 16:35:54 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab. Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57185
SABIROV v. Russia
SABIROV v. Russia RUS 28/06/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases mainly concern poor quality of the state appointed counsels legal aid in the context of different types of proceedings in different Russian regions in 2004 2008 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13807
SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia
SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/01/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal by domestic courts to examine a claim against the Presidential Decree terminating the applicant s term of office EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-453
SAID v. the Netherlands
SAID v. the Netherlands NLD 05/10/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of expulsion to Eritrea Article 3 conditional Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4539
SAKIK & OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKIK OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/11/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention due to the authorities failure to present the applicants promptly and automatically before a judge and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5470
SAMAT v. Turkey
SAMAT v. Turkey TUR 22/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial due to the lack of respect of the principle of legal certainty in proceedings concerning forest boundaries brought by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55541
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 16/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: The case concerns a refugee of Armenian origin who was forced to flee from his home during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1717
SARNELLI v. Italy
SARNELLI v. Italy ITA 17/10/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to inadequate compensation awarded for the expropriation of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44550
SATIK v. Turkey (no 2)
SATIK v. Turkey no 2 TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for expressing non violent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36778
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244