Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 83
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
ALBANESE v. Italy
ALBANESE v. Italy ITA 03/07/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Electoral rights protection of private and family life lack of an effective remedy: Improper suspension of the applicants electoral rights restrictions of their personal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44421
ANNUNZIATA v. Italy
ANNUNZIATA v. Italy ITA 06/11/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful interference due to arbitrary monitoring of prisoners correspondence based on a lack of a clear legal framework. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44685
ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 01/09/2021 00:00:00 17/09/2021 10:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the public screening at a museum from Bucharest of a movie portraying a same sex family organized by a Romanian association promoting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58377
AVUL v. Turkey
AVUL v. Turkey TUR 04/09/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Right to life: Alleged unlawful killing of the applicants son at the Turkish Iranian border as a result of the use of force by soldiers from the Islamic Republic of Iran and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37168
BAGARELLA v. Italy
BAGARELLA v. Italy ITA 07/07/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:08 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary monitoring of a prisoner s correspondence up to 2004 deriving from a lack of a clear legal framework. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42469
BARATTA v. Italy
BARATTA v. Italy ITA 13/01/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention as a result of criminal proceedings in absentia leading to life imprisonment of the accused in which he had been declared EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28272
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to the use of counter terrorism legislation by border control officers Schedule 7 Powers to stop and question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52217
BEKIRSKI v. Bulgaria
BEKIRSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 21/02/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment in detention: Torture and ensuing death of a detainee on remand due to the fact that he was not provided adequate medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3823
BENEDIK v. Slovenia
BENEDIK v. Slovenia SVN 24/07/2018 00:00:00 23/10/2018 17:25:37 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Arbitrary interference by the police on the basis of a law lacking clarity and sufficient safeguards to obtain and use without a court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50585
BENJAMIN AND WILSON v. the United Kingdom
BENJAMIN AND WILSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/12/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Absence of a right to bring proceedings to review the lawfulness of detention on mental health grounds due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2474
BYKOV v. Russia
BYKOV v. Russia RUS 03/10/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Unlawful interference with the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the lack of specific and detailed regulations providing for adequate safeguards EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13645
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands NLD 03/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Impossibility to establish retroactively the applicant s relationship with his late father who died before he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4469
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy ITA 24/09/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to involve parents adequately in the decision making process concerning the removal of the applicants children and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43946
D.S. v. the United Kingdom
D.S. v. the United Kingdom GBR 30/06/2021 00:00:00 15/07/2021 10:21:13 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the past disclosure of the applicant s criminal record pursuant to a regime in force until May EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58145
DE TOMMASO v. Italy
DE TOMMASO v. Italy ITA 23/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: This case concerns the quality of the Italian legislation on imposition of special police supervision orders involving restrictions of various freedoms on persons considered EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46307
DEMIREL v. Turkey
DEMIREL v. Turkey TUR 28/04/2003 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand and absence of sufficient reasons given by domestic courts in their decisions extending such EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37264
DRAGOS IOAN RUSU v. Romania
DRAGOS IOAN RUSU v. Romania ROU 31/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful interference due to the use of an urgent procedure for confiscating the applicant s postal correspondence in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48829
ELAHI v. the United Kingdom
ELAHI v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/09/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful production of tape recordings made from covert listening equipment in the homes of the applicants and in one case lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2872
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354