Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine UKR 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The group of cases concerns the disproportionate refusal of the authorities at different periods between 2005 2014 to provide an NGO and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55745
CITARELLA v. Italy
CITARELLA v. Italy ITA 15/04/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of private and family life electoral rights and effective remedy: Illegitimate restrictions of various rights ordered in the framework of the bankruptcy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44719
DE TOMMASO v. Italy
DE TOMMASO v. Italy ITA 23/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: This case concerns the quality of the Italian legislation on imposition of special police supervision orders involving restrictions of various freedoms on persons considered EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46307
HÁJOVSKÝ v. Slovakia
H JOVSK v. Slovakia SVK 01/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Failure of the domestic courts to carry out in 2014 2015 the balancing exercise between competing rights in line with the Court s case law criteria in a case concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58691
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 26/09/1996 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of Jehovah s witnesses for having used a private place for meetings prayers and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22122
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia
PAVLETIC v. Slovakia SVK 10/11/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention delay in the ruling on a request for release no decision had been delivered and lack enforceable right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7831
SALAPA v. Poland
SALAPA v. Poland POL 19/03/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of correspondence and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Deprivation of liberty by decision of the public prosecutor who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17711
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine UKR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:42:52 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the journalist s right to the protection of her sources in 2018 due to judicially authorised access to her mobile telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58305